<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pets are people</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kuchinskas</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7991</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kuchinskas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7991</guid>
		<description>As we learn more about the human attachment system -- that is, the brain activity and neurochemicals involved in forming relationships including love and trust -- it seems that it&#039;s not so much that we are conferring personhood on animals. Rather, our bonds with animals are no different than our bonds with other humans. Bonds with both are likely the result of a release of oxytocin into the parts of the brain that handle social relationships.
Moreover, dogs -- and very likely, most other pet mammals -- may experience an almost identical oxytocin release in the social areas of their brains, which are not very different from ours.
See:
Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behaviour between humans and dogs.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12672376?dopt=Abstract
and
Dog&#039;s Gaze at Owner Increases Urinary Oxytocin During Social Interaction
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19124024
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we learn more about the human attachment system &#8212; that is, the brain activity and neurochemicals involved in forming relationships including love and trust &#8212; it seems that it&#8217;s not so much that we are conferring personhood on animals. Rather, our bonds with animals are no different than our bonds with other humans. Bonds with both are likely the result of a release of oxytocin into the parts of the brain that handle social relationships.</p>
<p>Moreover, dogs &#8212; and very likely, most other pet mammals &#8212; may experience an almost identical oxytocin release in the social areas of their brains, which are not very different from ours.</p>
<p>See:</p>
<p>Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behaviour between humans and dogs.<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12672376?dopt=Abstract" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12672376?dopt=Abstract</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Dog&#8217;s Gaze at Owner Increases Urinary Oxytocin During Social Interaction<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19124024" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19124024</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7990</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7990</guid>
		<description>My dog definitely knows what certain words mean, such as &quot;bacon,&quot; &quot;cheese,&quot; &quot;out,&quot; &quot;off,&quot; or, &quot;find [insert family member name or pet name here],&quot; and she&#039;ll communicate to me certain things, such as that she wants me to turn on the faucet for a drink, or she wants / needs to go out.  It&#039;s not English or ASL, but it is conversational to some limited extent.  I don&#039;t confuse her nor my cats as being human, but I provide for them what I believe I should as their adoptive parent. (Yes, I shoo bugs and spiders out of my home instead of crunching them, and don&#039;t eat flesh foods.)  Some DO treat their animals way overboard, and to the disregard of other humans.  I believe God wishes us to care for all, and wish none would ever be tortured, starved, or homeless.  Interesting about the elephant video which I&#039;m too squemish to watch.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dog definitely knows what certain words mean, such as &#8220;bacon,&#8221; &#8220;cheese,&#8221; &#8220;out,&#8221; &#8220;off,&#8221; or, &#8220;find [insert family member name or pet name here],&#8221; and she&#8217;ll communicate to me certain things, such as that she wants me to turn on the faucet for a drink, or she wants / needs to go out.  It&#8217;s not English or ASL, but it is conversational to some limited extent.  I don&#8217;t confuse her nor my cats as being human, but I provide for them what I believe I should as their adoptive parent. (Yes, I shoo bugs and spiders out of my home instead of crunching them, and don&#8217;t eat flesh foods.)  Some DO treat their animals way overboard, and to the disregard of other humans.  I believe God wishes us to care for all, and wish none would ever be tortured, starved, or homeless.  Interesting about the elephant video which I&#8217;m too squemish to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick gogerty</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7989</link>
		<dc:creator>nick gogerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7989</guid>
		<description>the tendancy to anthropomorphize isn&#039;t just limited to animals.  A surprising number of Roomba robotic vacum cleaners name them as well.  We are social animals, to such a degree we extend the &quot;society&quot; to pretty much anything...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the tendancy to anthropomorphize isn&#8217;t just limited to animals.  A surprising number of Roomba robotic vacum cleaners name them as well.  We are social animals, to such a degree we extend the &#8220;society&#8221; to pretty much anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Key</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7988</link>
		<dc:creator>A Key</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7988</guid>
		<description>Female cats are preferred because they are friendlier and less predatorial not because of a concept that cats are female.  I don&#039;t know why male dogs are preferred; perhaps, they are more protective.  Also, marketing is changing to accommodate pet owners, including the sale of homes with pet showers, just as an example.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Female cats are preferred because they are friendlier and less predatorial not because of a concept that cats are female.  I don&#8217;t know why male dogs are preferred; perhaps, they are more protective.  Also, marketing is changing to accommodate pet owners, including the sale of homes with pet showers, just as an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Francis</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7992</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7992</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rich Getting Richer and Crazier: Why They Hate US&lt;/strong&gt;
GDP/PET HIGHER IN NORTH AMERICA AND EU THAN GDP/PERSON ELSEWHERE A dog hair piece on &quot;Sweeties&quot; August
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rich Getting Richer and Crazier: Why They Hate US</strong></p>
<p>GDP/PET HIGHER IN NORTH AMERICA AND EU THAN GDP/PERSON ELSEWHERE A dog hair piece on &#8220;Sweeties&#8221; August</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Francis</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7993</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7993</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rich Getting Richer and Crazier: Why They Hate US&lt;/strong&gt;
GDP/PET HIGHER IN NORTH AMERICA AND EU THAN GDP/PERSON ELSEWHERE A dog hair piece on &quot;Sweeties&quot; August
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rich Getting Richer and Crazier: Why They Hate US</strong></p>
<p>GDP/PET HIGHER IN NORTH AMERICA AND EU THAN GDP/PERSON ELSEWHERE A dog hair piece on &#8220;Sweeties&#8221; August</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Francis</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7994</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7994</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rich Getting Richer and Crazier: Why They Hate US&lt;/strong&gt;
GDP/PET HIGHER IN NORTH AMERICA AND EU THAN GDP/PERSON ELSEWHERE A dog hair piece on &quot;Sweeties&quot; August
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rich Getting Richer and Crazier: Why They Hate US</strong></p>
<p>GDP/PET HIGHER IN NORTH AMERICA AND EU THAN GDP/PERSON ELSEWHERE A dog hair piece on &#8220;Sweeties&#8221; August</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Francis</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7995</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7995</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rich Getting Richer and Crazier: Why They Hate US&lt;/strong&gt;
GDP/PET HIGHER IN NORTH AMERICA AND EU THAN GDP/PERSON ELSEWHERE Ruth Regina places a dog hair piece
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rich Getting Richer and Crazier: Why They Hate US</strong></p>
<p>GDP/PET HIGHER IN NORTH AMERICA AND EU THAN GDP/PERSON ELSEWHERE Ruth Regina places a dog hair piece</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnarCapLib</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7996</link>
		<dc:creator>AnarCapLib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 07:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7996</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pets as persons&lt;/strong&gt;
We have two dogs in the family (both bitches) and I love them. Well, not as much as the others in my family who spoil them rotten. I often am the only dog-disciplinarian in the house. The way my parents...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pets as persons</strong></p>
<p>We have two dogs in the family (both bitches) and I love them. Well, not as much as the others in my family who spoil them rotten. I often am the only dog-disciplinarian in the house. The way my parents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/06/pets_are_people.html/comment-page-1#comment-7987</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1192#comment-7987</guid>
		<description>Steve, Geertz&#039;s comment is about how we define the person, not animals.  And you are right, lots of other cultures endow animals with a variety of non-animal properties.  What&#039;s maybe striking about our culture is that our animals are not endowed with our collective cultural meanings, but with highly individuated, individualizing ones.  Other cultures make them Gods.  We make them companions.  But then that&#039;s us, isn&#039;t it?  Thanks, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, Geertz&#8217;s comment is about how we define the person, not animals.  And you are right, lots of other cultures endow animals with a variety of non-animal properties.  What&#8217;s maybe striking about our culture is that our animals are not endowed with our collective cultural meanings, but with highly individuated, individualizing ones.  Other cultures make them Gods.  We make them companions.  But then that&#8217;s us, isn&#8217;t it?  Thanks, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

