<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow my bliss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2004/08/follow_my_bliss.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/08/follow_my_bliss.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/08/follow_my_bliss.html/comment-page-1#comment-7733</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1150#comment-7733</guid>
		<description>Steve, thanks for the update on your reactions to Klein.  As to the distinction being embracing contradiction and denial of same, I think the latter is just more interesting.  It opens up possibilities instead of hiding them away.  No?
Best, grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, thanks for the update on your reactions to Klein.  As to the distinction being embracing contradiction and denial of same, I think the latter is just more interesting.  It opens up possibilities instead of hiding them away.  No?<br />
Best, grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbarrett</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/08/follow_my_bliss.html/comment-page-1#comment-7732</link>
		<dc:creator>jbarrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 01:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1150#comment-7732</guid>
		<description>The advice seems not all that fresh. The theme was also a mantra of the nineteen sixties; maybe also of the fifties.
I wonder if it is particularly inspirational to todays youth towards which it seems directed; youth filled with desires and expectation and unfettered by the investments of choices made. The implication that everything will be all right is irritating to read, of course it wont, but even inexperienced youth can tell nonsense when they read it. Do you suppose?
At any rate, I dont agree that those who ardently follow such advice are mostly doomed to a life in the airless discomfort of an RV. There are opportunities to self correct and our culture provides them in abundance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advice seems not all that fresh. The theme was also a mantra of the nineteen sixties; maybe also of the fifties.</p>
<p>I wonder if it is particularly inspirational to todays youth towards which it seems directed; youth filled with desires and expectation and unfettered by the investments of choices made. The implication that everything will be all right is irritating to read, of course it wont, but even inexperienced youth can tell nonsense when they read it. Do you suppose?</p>
<p>At any rate, I dont agree that those who ardently follow such advice are mostly doomed to a life in the airless discomfort of an RV. There are opportunities to self correct and our culture provides them in abundance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Portigal</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/08/follow_my_bliss.html/comment-page-1#comment-7731</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Portigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1150#comment-7731</guid>
		<description>But all I said is that Naomi could write about it for an entire chapter. I didn&#039;t say anything beyond that!
In fact, after years of reading her column clipped and mailed to me by my mom (who doesn&#039;t read your blog), I picked up the book, and put it down again, overwhelmed with earnestness. Then I worked with a marketer who was VERY into the book, and I swallowed my discomfort and picked it up. I found that I enjoyed the first 1/2, and made it through the first 3/4, before flipping pages towards the end. The stories about marketing were interesting, and you didn&#039;t need to share her politics to learn from it.
I&#039;m reading Ralph Caplan&#039;s 1982 &quot;By Design&quot; on my trip to Vegas now, and I&#039;m struck by a similarity in stance, although Caplan is much much more wry and pointed in his opinions, but there&#039;s an overlap there somewhere.
And Grant, what&#039;s the difference between embracing a cultural contradiction and denial?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But all I said is that Naomi could write about it for an entire chapter. I didn&#8217;t say anything beyond that!</p>
<p>In fact, after years of reading her column clipped and mailed to me by my mom (who doesn&#8217;t read your blog), I picked up the book, and put it down again, overwhelmed with earnestness. Then I worked with a marketer who was VERY into the book, and I swallowed my discomfort and picked it up. I found that I enjoyed the first 1/2, and made it through the first 3/4, before flipping pages towards the end. The stories about marketing were interesting, and you didn&#8217;t need to share her politics to learn from it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reading Ralph Caplan&#8217;s 1982 &#8220;By Design&#8221; on my trip to Vegas now, and I&#8217;m struck by a similarity in stance, although Caplan is much much more wry and pointed in his opinions, but there&#8217;s an overlap there somewhere.</p>
<p>And Grant, what&#8217;s the difference between embracing a cultural contradiction and denial?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/08/follow_my_bliss.html/comment-page-1#comment-7730</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 23:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1150#comment-7730</guid>
		<description>Steve, thanks for the post, you and I differ about Naomi, I think.  Starbucks is at least interesting enough to embrace a cultural contradiction.  This is more complexity than poor Naomi could possibly manage.  Thanks,
Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, thanks for the post, you and I differ about Naomi, I think.  Starbucks is at least interesting enough to embrace a cultural contradiction.  This is more complexity than poor Naomi could possibly manage.  Thanks,<br />
Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Portigal</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/08/follow_my_bliss.html/comment-page-1#comment-7729</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Portigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1150#comment-7729</guid>
		<description>The idea of Starbucks associating themselves with resisting conformity seems like fodder for an entire Naomi Klein chapter. &quot;Ironic&quot; or &quot;disingenuous&quot; doesn&#039;t quite seem to cut it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of Starbucks associating themselves with resisting conformity seems like fodder for an entire Naomi Klein chapter. &#8220;Ironic&#8221; or &#8220;disingenuous&#8221; doesn&#8217;t quite seem to cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

