<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: having dinner with Sherlock Holmes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2004/09/having_dinner_w.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/09/having_dinner_w.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/09/having_dinner_w.html/comment-page-1#comment-7375</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1121#comment-7375</guid>
		<description>Ennis, great point, it may be that the earliest innovators get so little thanks (relative to the value they eventually create) that they have to &quot;pay&quot; themselves in self righteousness.
But Alice Waters is a kind of Goddess.  Every foodie tells us so.  So she got bundles of recognition and lots of material reward.  So the self righteousness begins to look just selfish and provincial.  In sum, she reproduces some of the faults of the food culture she claimed to hate.  Thanks, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ennis, great point, it may be that the earliest innovators get so little thanks (relative to the value they eventually create) that they have to &#8220;pay&#8221; themselves in self righteousness.</p>
<p>But Alice Waters is a kind of Goddess.  Every foodie tells us so.  So she got bundles of recognition and lots of material reward.  So the self righteousness begins to look just selfish and provincial.  In sum, she reproduces some of the faults of the food culture she claimed to hate.  Thanks, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ennis</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/09/having_dinner_w.html/comment-page-1#comment-7374</link>
		<dc:creator>Ennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1121#comment-7374</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re entitled to be differently righteous b/c of their order in terms of changing the world. Whether they do or not is a different question ... that might explain it, but I wouldn&#039;t jump to that conclusion w/o supporting evidence.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re entitled to be differently righteous b/c of their order in terms of changing the world. Whether they do or not is a different question &#8230; that might explain it, but I wouldn&#8217;t jump to that conclusion w/o supporting evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/09/having_dinner_w.html/comment-page-1#comment-7373</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1121#comment-7373</guid>
		<description>Ennis, thank you, that&#039;s clarifying, do you think they differ on the self righteousness scale because they differ on the innovator continuum?  Best, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ennis, thank you, that&#8217;s clarifying, do you think they differ on the self righteousness scale because they differ on the innovator continuum?  Best, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ennis</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/09/having_dinner_w.html/comment-page-1#comment-7372</link>
		<dc:creator>Ennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1121#comment-7372</guid>
		<description>I am jealous. I don&#039;t know if I would put those two on exactly the same plane. I think of Waters like Martin Luther, she shook up American food in a profound way. Miller is more like Calvin, a key figure, but a secondary one whose position is defined in terms of the revolution put into motion by the first.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am jealous. I don&#8217;t know if I would put those two on exactly the same plane. I think of Waters like Martin Luther, she shook up American food in a profound way. Miller is more like Calvin, a key figure, but a secondary one whose position is defined in terms of the revolution put into motion by the first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

