<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: newspapers vs. blogs: I think we&#8217;re catching up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-6895</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 01:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1052#comment-6895</guid>
		<description>Responding to a tangent: I compose most posts (and not a few responses or comments) in a text editor (BBEdit) and then paste.  Saves that annoying loss problem.
BTW, I wish you and yours peace joy &amp; increase for the coming year.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to a tangent: I compose most posts (and not a few responses or comments) in a text editor (BBEdit) and then paste.  Saves that annoying loss problem.</p>
<p>BTW, I wish you and yours peace joy &#038; increase for the coming year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-6894</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1052#comment-6894</guid>
		<description>AH, Ginna, and Jim, my feelings exactly.  Thank you, Grant
Virginia, I didnt sent her an email, but a phone message.  And you tell me, is there a journalist on the planet who ignores their answering machine.  (And I have no backup copy because my computer crashed, a fact she knew.)
As to your 2nd paragraph: perhaps this is a Canadian-American difference.  Canadians in the cultural domain play it very zero-sum.  So much for kinder and gentler.
Thanks, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH, Ginna, and Jim, my feelings exactly.  Thank you, Grant</p>
<p>Virginia, I didnt sent her an email, but a phone message.  And you tell me, is there a journalist on the planet who ignores their answering machine.  (And I have no backup copy because my computer crashed, a fact she knew.)</p>
<p>As to your 2nd paragraph: perhaps this is a Canadian-American difference.  Canadians in the cultural domain play it very zero-sum.  So much for kinder and gentler.</p>
<p>Thanks, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Postrel</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-6893</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Postrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1052#comment-6893</guid>
		<description>I suspect you&#039;re overinterpreting her lack of response. She may be busy, may be on vacation, may not be good about responding to email, may have deleted your email, or there may be any number of other reasons she didn&#039;t respond. Or she may just wonder why you don&#039;t have a copy in your &quot;messages sent&quot; file.
&lt;p&gt;
At any rate, I know lots of journalists and I don&#039;t know any journalists who would see your post as stealing an idea as general as &quot;write something about Christmas trees.&quot; Indeed, if you&#039;d written the post first, a journalist could easily have called you to get you to elaborate or just say it again over the phone.  It happens all the time with other forms of publication, from books to academic papers.  I don&#039;t know why it wouldn&#039;t happen with blog postings and, in fact, I&#039;m not entirely sure it hasn&#039;t happened to me. I&#039;m pretty sure it has happened to some of the legal experts on Volokh Conspiracy.
&lt;p&gt;
A newspaper reporter is going to round up a bunch of different people&#039;s different thoughts on Christmas tree and weave them into something new. A blog posting that represents a single source&#039;s thoughts is not in conflict with such an article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect you&#8217;re overinterpreting her lack of response. She may be busy, may be on vacation, may not be good about responding to email, may have deleted your email, or there may be any number of other reasons she didn&#8217;t respond. Or she may just wonder why you don&#8217;t have a copy in your &#8220;messages sent&#8221; file.</p>
<p>
At any rate, I know lots of journalists and I don&#8217;t know any journalists who would see your post as stealing an idea as general as &#8220;write something about Christmas trees.&#8221; Indeed, if you&#8217;d written the post first, a journalist could easily have called you to get you to elaborate or just say it again over the phone.  It happens all the time with other forms of publication, from books to academic papers.  I don&#8217;t know why it wouldn&#8217;t happen with blog postings and, in fact, I&#8217;m not entirely sure it hasn&#8217;t happened to me. I&#8217;m pretty sure it has happened to some of the legal experts on Volokh Conspiracy.
</p>
<p>
A newspaper reporter is going to round up a bunch of different people&#8217;s different thoughts on Christmas tree and weave them into something new. A blog posting that represents a single source&#8217;s thoughts is not in conflict with such an article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dingwall</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-6892</link>
		<dc:creator>Dingwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1052#comment-6892</guid>
		<description>The person who &quot;owns&quot; a story is the person who tells the story best. I suspect after reading your take on the subject, Ms. Milroy recognized she was going to be in trouble on that point.
Merry Christmas to you, Pam and Cat.
dingwall
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person who &#8220;owns&#8221; a story is the person who tells the story best. I suspect after reading your take on the subject, Ms. Milroy recognized she was going to be in trouble on that point.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas to you, Pam and Cat.</p>
<p>dingwall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginna Dowler</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-6891</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginna Dowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 00:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1052#comment-6891</guid>
		<description>Or it may be that she&#039;s personally threatened. I read the Globe every day, and while Sarah Milroy&#039;s name is vaguely familiar, I can&#039;t remember a single thing she&#039;s written.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or it may be that she&#8217;s personally threatened. I read the Globe every day, and while Sarah Milroy&#8217;s name is vaguely familiar, I can&#8217;t remember a single thing she&#8217;s written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Portigal</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-6890</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Portigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1052#comment-6890</guid>
		<description>I wonder there&#039;s a conflict in her mind in terms of ownership of &quot;the story&quot; - is it your story or her story? I&#039;m sure the writer feels the ownership, but as a content contributor, I&#039;m sure you feel the same.
It&#039;s kind of like ethnography - we sometimes entice people to participate with the indication that their contribution will help drive the creation of a future product. But of course, when we synthesize and deliver findings from these interviews, we don&#039;t think of any insights that came from those interviews as belong to them, they belong to us! We did the interviews!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder there&#8217;s a conflict in her mind in terms of ownership of &#8220;the story&#8221; &#8211; is it your story or her story? I&#8217;m sure the writer feels the ownership, but as a content contributor, I&#8217;m sure you feel the same.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of like ethnography &#8211; we sometimes entice people to participate with the indication that their contribution will help drive the creation of a future product. But of course, when we synthesize and deliver findings from these interviews, we don&#8217;t think of any insights that came from those interviews as belong to them, they belong to us! We did the interviews!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2004/12/newspapers_vs_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-6889</link>
		<dc:creator>AH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=1052#comment-6889</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s belaboring the obvious, but journalists used to have a hammerlock on publishing, so that they could condescend to gather a variety of our opinions, and select the ones they could profitably use. Now anyone worth asking, and more, are already publishing.  What a shock that must be! Essentially, the reporter can now only ask other reporters for material, unless she does real primary or documentary research.
Heh.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s belaboring the obvious, but journalists used to have a hammerlock on publishing, so that they could condescend to gather a variety of our opinions, and select the ones they could profitably use. Now anyone worth asking, and more, are already publishing.  What a shock that must be! Essentially, the reporter can now only ask other reporters for material, unless she does real primary or documentary research.</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

