<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Comeback: something more like life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.R.</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/comment-page-1#comment-6171</link>
		<dc:creator>T.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=929#comment-6171</guid>
		<description>This is by far the worst show on HBO. It is ridiculously stupid and boring and Lisa Kudrow&#039;s voice is annoying as hell. I&#039;d rather watch a real reality show, even Bobby Brown, than a tv show made into a fake reality show.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is by far the worst show on HBO. It is ridiculously stupid and boring and Lisa Kudrow&#8217;s voice is annoying as hell. I&#8217;d rather watch a real reality show, even Bobby Brown, than a tv show made into a fake reality show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/comment-page-1#comment-6170</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=929#comment-6170</guid>
		<description>Tom, thanks! Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, thanks! Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Guarriello</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/comment-page-1#comment-6169</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Guarriello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=929#comment-6169</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fastener?&quot; Just thought, &quot;hit the nail on the head&quot; was so, well, 20th century.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fastener?&#8221; Just thought, &#8220;hit the nail on the head&#8221; was so, well, 20th century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/comment-page-1#comment-6168</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=929#comment-6168</guid>
		<description>Matt, thanks for that very useful reminder of the economic conditions of their creativity!  Best, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, thanks for that very useful reminder of the economic conditions of their creativity!  Best, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/comment-page-1#comment-6167</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=929#comment-6167</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot to be said also for the freedom that HBO&#039;s business model implies. The broadcast networks have to lease their viewers&#039; eyeballs to advertisers, so by and large they&#039;ve tried to avoid ever giving offense or making anybody uncomfortable, for fear that somebody might remember that the TV has an &quot;off&quot; button. HBO doesn&#039;t have advertisers. They don&#039;t care about your eyeballs. As long as there&#039;s _something_ on their channel that you like enough to keep subscribing, they keep getting paid, even if you dislike everything else they air. Which means that they can take a lot more risks.
And since an overwhelmingly disproportionate number of those risks have paid off, they&#039;ve been dragging the networks (kicking and screaming, most of the time) into a less risk-averse posture as well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot to be said also for the freedom that HBO&#8217;s business model implies. The broadcast networks have to lease their viewers&#8217; eyeballs to advertisers, so by and large they&#8217;ve tried to avoid ever giving offense or making anybody uncomfortable, for fear that somebody might remember that the TV has an &#8220;off&#8221; button. HBO doesn&#8217;t have advertisers. They don&#8217;t care about your eyeballs. As long as there&#8217;s _something_ on their channel that you like enough to keep subscribing, they keep getting paid, even if you dislike everything else they air. Which means that they can take a lot more risks.</p>
<p>And since an overwhelmingly disproportionate number of those risks have paid off, they&#8217;ve been dragging the networks (kicking and screaming, most of the time) into a less risk-averse posture as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/comment-page-1#comment-6166</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=929#comment-6166</guid>
		<description>Tom, Thanks! (what&#039;s a fastener?)  Best, Grant
Ed, I agree, this improvement comes from competition, not good intentions.  A little competition does what an arts council cannot?  Until a couple of weeks ago I steered clear of 2.5 men, but then I had a look and found it surprisingly witty.  Yes, it plays out an Oscar and Felix, men as dopes, stereotype that I find obnoxious.  But it was written with pace.  Thanks.  Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, Thanks! (what&#8217;s a fastener?)  Best, Grant</p>
<p>Ed, I agree, this improvement comes from competition, not good intentions.  A little competition does what an arts council cannot?  Until a couple of weeks ago I steered clear of 2.5 men, but then I had a look and found it surprisingly witty.  Yes, it plays out an Oscar and Felix, men as dopes, stereotype that I find obnoxious.  But it was written with pace.  Thanks.  Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Batista</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/comment-page-1#comment-6165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Batista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=929#comment-6165</guid>
		<description>Anyone who saw Lisa Kudrow in Don Roos&#039; &quot;The Opposite of Sex&quot; (1998) knows that she&#039;s always been capable of so much more than &quot;Friends&quot; ever asked of her.  (The same could be said of Jennifer Aniston--see Miguel Arteta&#039;s &quot;The Good Girl&quot; (2002).)
I agree that the mainstream culture industry is more willing to embrace complexity and nuance than it once was, but I also see that as a reflection of changing market dynamics.  Big audiences are a lot smaller than they used to be, so shows and movies are targeted at ever-smaller niches.  Because they don&#039;t have to appeal across such a broad demographic gulf, these entertainments can reflect a particular niche&#039;s distinct preferences, be it for emotional subtlety or graphic violence.
And let&#039;s not overstate the case--five of the top 13 shows for the last Nielsen period (June 6-12) were episodes of &quot;Two and a Half Men,&quot; and that&#039;s a pretty old-school sitcom.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who saw Lisa Kudrow in Don Roos&#8217; &#8220;The Opposite of Sex&#8221; (1998) knows that she&#8217;s always been capable of so much more than &#8220;Friends&#8221; ever asked of her.  (The same could be said of Jennifer Aniston&#8211;see Miguel Arteta&#8217;s &#8220;The Good Girl&#8221; (2002).)</p>
<p>I agree that the mainstream culture industry is more willing to embrace complexity and nuance than it once was, but I also see that as a reflection of changing market dynamics.  Big audiences are a lot smaller than they used to be, so shows and movies are targeted at ever-smaller niches.  Because they don&#8217;t have to appeal across such a broad demographic gulf, these entertainments can reflect a particular niche&#8217;s distinct preferences, be it for emotional subtlety or graphic violence.</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s not overstate the case&#8211;five of the top 13 shows for the last Nielsen period (June 6-12) were episodes of &#8220;Two and a Half Men,&#8221; and that&#8217;s a pretty old-school sitcom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Guarriello</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/06/the_comeback_so.html/comment-page-1#comment-6164</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Guarriello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=929#comment-6164</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve smacked the fastener cleanly again, Grant! The Johnson &quot;cognitive complexity&quot; standard for things being &quot;good for you&quot; misses entirely the emotional impact of the pop culture items he tracks. In the old days, the behaviorists used to argue that violent TV taught violence; the psychoanalysts, that it cathexed impulses, kind of bleeding off the pressure, if you will. Nowadays, we map multiple story lines and sound the all clear.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve smacked the fastener cleanly again, Grant! The Johnson &#8220;cognitive complexity&#8221; standard for things being &#8220;good for you&#8221; misses entirely the emotional impact of the pop culture items he tracks. In the old days, the behaviorists used to argue that violent TV taught violence; the psychoanalysts, that it cathexed impulses, kind of bleeding off the pressure, if you will. Nowadays, we map multiple story lines and sound the all clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

