<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brands, a new content supplier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2005/11/brands_as_conte.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/11/brands_as_conte.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/11/brands_as_conte.html/comment-page-1#comment-5578</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=835#comment-5578</guid>
		<description>Carol, that&#039;s it exactly, the commercial world cannot, may not, participate in the creation of content for the consumers unless they create things that are genuinely interesting and useful thereto (i.e., maximally authentic).  This will be a challenge certainly.  It may even be impossible.  But I don&#039;t think so.  Or to put it another way, this is a very new trick for so old a dog, but not impossible.  Indeed, just about everyone in the advertising and marketing world is dying to create more richer, more interesting stuff.  Thanks for a great question.  Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol, that&#8217;s it exactly, the commercial world cannot, may not, participate in the creation of content for the consumers unless they create things that are genuinely interesting and useful thereto (i.e., maximally authentic).  This will be a challenge certainly.  It may even be impossible.  But I don&#8217;t think so.  Or to put it another way, this is a very new trick for so old a dog, but not impossible.  Indeed, just about everyone in the advertising and marketing world is dying to create more richer, more interesting stuff.  Thanks for a great question.  Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarolGee</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/11/brands_as_conte.html/comment-page-1#comment-5577</link>
		<dc:creator>CarolGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=835#comment-5577</guid>
		<description>I rather like it that the connectedness of social networking is rather unselfconscious.  Otherwise the interactions become so calculated as to destroy authenticity.  The ads I like best, and the ones that make me remember the brand, are the ones that connect in what seem to be an authentic ways.  Am I too innocent when I assume that acting in good faith and trying to stay real can happen even on the advertising fast track?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather like it that the connectedness of social networking is rather unselfconscious.  Otherwise the interactions become so calculated as to destroy authenticity.  The ads I like best, and the ones that make me remember the brand, are the ones that connect in what seem to be an authentic ways.  Am I too innocent when I assume that acting in good faith and trying to stay real can happen even on the advertising fast track?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/11/brands_as_conte.html/comment-page-1#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=835#comment-5576</guid>
		<description>Tom, we may be doing it, but packaged goods brands are still creating &quot;messages&quot; designed to travel between the brand and the consumer, not between the consumer and the consumer.  Sometimes, accidentally, they create something that moves between consumer and consumer: the dreadful wuzzup or &quot;I&#039;ve fallen and I...&quot;  _Some_ agencies think about creating take-away lines of the kind that Hollywood has long produced (&quot;I&#039;ll be back&quot;), but I reckon these are designed without regard to their network effects.  Thanks, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, we may be doing it, but packaged goods brands are still creating &#8220;messages&#8221; designed to travel between the brand and the consumer, not between the consumer and the consumer.  Sometimes, accidentally, they create something that moves between consumer and consumer: the dreadful wuzzup or &#8220;I&#8217;ve fallen and I&#8230;&#8221;  _Some_ agencies think about creating take-away lines of the kind that Hollywood has long produced (&#8220;I&#8217;ll be back&#8221;), but I reckon these are designed without regard to their network effects.  Thanks, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Asacker</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/11/brands_as_conte.html/comment-page-1#comment-5575</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Asacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=835#comment-5575</guid>
		<description>Hey Grant,
Isn&#039;t that precisely what bloggers are doing? Aggregating buzz worthy content for people to bring back to their social network, and then &quot;branding&quot; and reselling that attention (aka brand)?
Am I missing something?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Grant,</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that precisely what bloggers are doing? Aggregating buzz worthy content for people to bring back to their social network, and then &#8220;branding&#8221; and reselling that attention (aka brand)?</p>
<p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greater Democracy</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/11/brands_as_conte.html/comment-page-1#comment-5579</link>
		<dc:creator>Greater Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=835#comment-5579</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A New Content Supplier&lt;/strong&gt;
Back in August, I wrote about Political Network Topologies, drawing a distinction between two models of politics, one in terms of social networks and the other in terms of citizens as con...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A New Content Supplier</strong></p>
<p>Back in August, I wrote about Political Network Topologies, drawing a distinction between two models of politics, one in terms of social networks and the other in terms of citizens as con&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

