<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transmedia: branding&#8217;s next new thing? (Part Two)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2005/12/transmedia_bran_1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/12/transmedia_bran_1.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:10:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/12/transmedia_bran_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-5060</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-5060</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. I think your point about not wanting to crowd the customer&#039;s imagination too much with narrative is well-taken. There are a few drawbacks with over-narrativizing (ugh) an ad image: a) Not everyone in the target audience likes the same stories and meanings. To choose is then to exclude. b) The brand promise or characteristics may need to change over time, and it could be awkward to modify the preexisting narrative. c) There is something appealing, and in some cases glamorous, about a shallow or &quot;flat&quot; presentation. Think about the Camel cigarette girls--you don&#039;t get any backstory and  can therefore free-associate about sex and fun without being reminded of the costs of sex and fun (especially the lung cancer aspects). Or, if you are the kind of person who likes to make up elaborate mental fantasies, you can use the clothing and historic period cues to do that. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I think your point about not wanting to crowd the customer&#39;s imagination too much with narrative is well-taken. There are a few drawbacks with over-narrativizing (ugh) an ad image: a) Not everyone in the target audience likes the same stories and meanings. To choose is then to exclude. b) The brand promise or characteristics may need to change over time, and it could be awkward to modify the preexisting narrative. c) There is something appealing, and in some cases glamorous, about a shallow or &quot;flat&quot; presentation. Think about the Camel cigarette girls&#8211;you don&#39;t get any backstory and  can therefore free-associate about sex and fun without being reminded of the costs of sex and fun (especially the lung cancer aspects). Or, if you are the kind of person who likes to make up elaborate mental fantasies, you can use the clothing and historic period cues to do that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/12/transmedia_bran_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-5059</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-5059</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ole Olson, thank you, sir.  Changing it now.  Grant&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ole Olson, thank you, sir.  Changing it now.  Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ole olson</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2005/12/transmedia_bran_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-5058</link>
		<dc:creator>ole olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-5058</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Perdue = chickens&lt;br /&gt;
Purdue = Big 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perdue = chickens<br />
Purdue = Big 10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
