<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rootgate: it&#8217;s getting worse and worse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quotulatiousness</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html/comment-page-1#comment-5255</link>
		<dc:creator>Quotulatiousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=788#comment-5255</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Root(kit) of Sony&#039;s Problems&lt;/strong&gt;
Grant McCracken ponders just how out-of-touch the CEO of Sony must be to utter something like this at a public forum: &quot;Clearly the perception out there is that we shouldn&#039;t be doing too much of that copy protection stuff.&quot; Or,...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Root(kit) of Sony&#8217;s Problems</strong></p>
<p>Grant McCracken ponders just how out-of-touch the CEO of Sony must be to utter something like this at a public forum: &#8220;Clearly the perception out there is that we shouldn&#8217;t be doing too much of that copy protection stuff.&#8221; Or,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madisonian.net</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html/comment-page-1#comment-5256</link>
		<dc:creator>madisonian.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=788#comment-5256</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Rhetoric of Free Culture&lt;/strong&gt;
What do we call the kids?
Grant McCracken puzzles over a reference in a recent talk by Sony CEO to the push and pull generation.  That phrase means, apparently, pirate kids  ones who dont respect authors as they download a...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Rhetoric of Free Culture</strong></p>
<p>What do we call the kids?<br />
Grant McCracken puzzles over a reference in a recent talk by Sony CEO to the push and pull generation.  That phrase means, apparently, pirate kids  ones who dont respect authors as they download a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M E-L</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html/comment-page-1#comment-5254</link>
		<dc:creator>M E-L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=788#comment-5254</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s supposed to be shorthand for &quot;push [a button,] pull [out a (stolen) digital file?]&quot; Or maybe he&#039;s confused about what P2P stands for. Or maybe it&#039;s a reference to the &quot;PushMePullYou&quot; in Dr. Doolittle! Yeah, that&#039;s it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s supposed to be shorthand for &#8220;push [a button,] pull [out a (stolen) digital file?]&#8221; Or maybe he&#8217;s confused about what P2P stands for. Or maybe it&#8217;s a reference to the &#8220;PushMePullYou&#8221; in Dr. Doolittle! Yeah, that&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Guarriello</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html/comment-page-1#comment-5253</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Guarriello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=788#comment-5253</guid>
		<description>Seems to me he was referring to the generation for whom &quot;push&quot; and &quot;pull&quot; have digital significance, regardless of the particular, contradictory, meanings of those terms. &quot;Willful,&quot; &quot;headstrong,&quot; &quot;entitled,&quot; may very well have been his point. I agree that it was a peevish reach. But, an interesting one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me he was referring to the generation for whom &#8220;push&#8221; and &#8220;pull&#8221; have digital significance, regardless of the particular, contradictory, meanings of those terms. &#8220;Willful,&#8221; &#8220;headstrong,&#8221; &#8220;entitled,&#8221; may very well have been his point. I agree that it was a peevish reach. But, an interesting one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html/comment-page-1#comment-5252</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=788#comment-5252</guid>
		<description>Tom, I know the terms, thank you, which makes me doubt that Stinger is using them as you suggest.  They are after all mutually exclusive, so combining them doesn&#039;t make any sense logically.  And in any case, what remote sense would it make to describe the segments in question with this language...especially in this context?  Could he mean &quot;they wish to be served and to help themselves?&quot;  Does this mean he thinks of them as contrary, wilful, indulged?  Would this be a species of CEO peevishness.  I think it&#039;s more likely the guy was just flying by the seat of his pants.  And on this issue!  Thanks, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I know the terms, thank you, which makes me doubt that Stinger is using them as you suggest.  They are after all mutually exclusive, so combining them doesn&#8217;t make any sense logically.  And in any case, what remote sense would it make to describe the segments in question with this language&#8230;especially in this context?  Could he mean &#8220;they wish to be served and to help themselves?&#8221;  Does this mean he thinks of them as contrary, wilful, indulged?  Would this be a species of CEO peevishness.  I think it&#8217;s more likely the guy was just flying by the seat of his pants.  And on this issue!  Thanks, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quotulatiousness</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html/comment-page-1#comment-5257</link>
		<dc:creator>Quotulatiousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=788#comment-5257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Root(kit) of Sony&#039;s Problems&lt;/strong&gt;
Grant McCracken ponders just how out-of-touch the CEO of Sony must be to utter something like this at a public forum: &quot;Clearly the perception out there is that we shouldn&#039;t be doing too much of that copy protection stuff.&quot; Or,...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Root(kit) of Sony&#8217;s Problems</strong></p>
<p>Grant McCracken ponders just how out-of-touch the CEO of Sony must be to utter something like this at a public forum: &#8220;Clearly the perception out there is that we shouldn&#8217;t be doing too much of that copy protection stuff.&#8221; Or,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Guarriello</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/nice_work_by_br.html/comment-page-1#comment-5251</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Guarriello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=788#comment-5251</guid>
		<description>Stringer was using Web-geek vernacular. &quot;Push&quot; is what gets done with most marketing emails, like spam. &quot;Pull&quot; is what gets done through subcription, like RSS. The &quot;push-pull generation&quot; seems to have been a reference to those who use those terms freely. Definitely too &quot;inside baseball&quot; for a general audience speech. And the whold rootkit issues is such a debacle, that it calls Stringer&#039;s leadership capabilites in this complex world into question...Oxford education aside.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stringer was using Web-geek vernacular. &#8220;Push&#8221; is what gets done with most marketing emails, like spam. &#8220;Pull&#8221; is what gets done through subcription, like RSS. The &#8220;push-pull generation&#8221; seems to have been a reference to those who use those terms freely. Definitely too &#8220;inside baseball&#8221; for a general audience speech. And the whold rootkit issues is such a debacle, that it calls Stringer&#8217;s leadership capabilites in this complex world into question&#8230;Oxford education aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

