<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Product placement as marketing malfeasance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shared Hosting</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/comment-page-1#comment-27038</link>
		<dc:creator>Shared Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=787#comment-27038</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter[...]...&lt;/strong&gt;
[...] Read the rest of this excellent post here.... [...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter[...]&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] Read the rest of this excellent post here&#8230;. [...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Factoring Advice</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/comment-page-1#comment-26199</link>
		<dc:creator>Factoring Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=787#comment-26199</guid>
		<description>I work in the film and tv funding sector and as money gets tight I see placements being the answer to funding gaps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in the film and tv funding sector and as money gets tight I see placements being the answer to funding gaps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver White</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/comment-page-1#comment-5250</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=787#comment-5250</guid>
		<description>
My views may be slightly biased on product placement as I work for one of the UK&#039;s leading product placement agencies, 1st Place.
However, I would like to point out that the product placement of brands  has proven effectiveness in increasing viewer enjoyment. Research conducted by mediaedge cia shows that product placement increases viewer enjoyment. Therefore, if it&#039;s proven to be beneficial to the viewer than it serves a very valid purpose.
The placing of brands simply reflects real life...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My views may be slightly biased on product placement as I work for one of the UK&#8217;s leading product placement agencies, 1st Place.</p>
<p>However, I would like to point out that the product placement of brands  has proven effectiveness in increasing viewer enjoyment. Research conducted by mediaedge cia shows that product placement increases viewer enjoyment. Therefore, if it&#8217;s proven to be beneficial to the viewer than it serves a very valid purpose.</p>
<p>The placing of brands simply reflects real life&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/comment-page-1#comment-5249</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=787#comment-5249</guid>
		<description>Check out my blog for alternative views.
http://productplacementwatch.blogspot.com/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out my blog for alternative views.<br />
<a href="http://productplacementwatch.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://productplacementwatch.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/comment-page-1#comment-5248</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=787#comment-5248</guid>
		<description>Although finding this post rather late, I believe you still pose valid points to serve as a contrasting view of my own thoughts on product placement. Aside from finding the humor in pointing out pp in various media vehicles, I believe pp can be useful if executed strategically (ie. fits the content and target audience of the vehicle).
Even Neilsen has found that pp must have some value in it, evident in its new system to rate and valuate pp instances. While I value your views and even agree with some of them, I do not believe they give an accurate picture of pp efforts as a whole.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although finding this post rather late, I believe you still pose valid points to serve as a contrasting view of my own thoughts on product placement. Aside from finding the humor in pointing out pp in various media vehicles, I believe pp can be useful if executed strategically (ie. fits the content and target audience of the vehicle).</p>
<p>Even Neilsen has found that pp must have some value in it, evident in its new system to rate and valuate pp instances. While I value your views and even agree with some of them, I do not believe they give an accurate picture of pp efforts as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/comment-page-1#comment-5247</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=787#comment-5247</guid>
		<description>Check out this blog on product placement and branded entertainment
http://magneticalliance.blogspot.com/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this blog on product placement and branded entertainment</p>
<p><a href="http://magneticalliance.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://magneticalliance.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Stone</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/comment-page-1#comment-5246</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=787#comment-5246</guid>
		<description>Grant,
I&#039;ve recommended this piece in my post today (http://decentmarketing.typepad.com/weblog/2006/01/celeb_overkill.html)on celebrity marketing madness.  Great post!
-Katherine
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant,<br />
I&#8217;ve recommended this piece in my post today (<a href="http://decentmarketing.typepad.com/weblog/2006/01/celeb_overkill.html" rel="nofollow">http://decentmarketing.typepad.com/weblog/2006/01/celeb_overkill.html</a>)on celebrity marketing madness.  Great post!<br />
-Katherine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Owner's Manual</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/01/product_placeme.html/comment-page-1#comment-5245</link>
		<dc:creator>The Owner's Manual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=787#comment-5245</guid>
		<description>I tend to think Donald Trump is more likely to be correct when he says the Martha Stewart version of The Apprentice diluted the franchise and pulled down the ratings.
Product placement is integral to The Apprentice.  It&#039;s more interesting to watch candidates deal with major companies such as Sony, Pontiac, and Universal Studios than unknown entities.
Donald&#039;s show may be the only one that wouldn&#039;t be nearly as good without PP and is not a good example of PP problems.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to think Donald Trump is more likely to be correct when he says the Martha Stewart version of The Apprentice diluted the franchise and pulled down the ratings.</p>
<p>Product placement is integral to The Apprentice.  It&#8217;s more interesting to watch candidates deal with major companies such as Sony, Pontiac, and Universal Studios than unknown entities.</p>
<p>Donald&#8217;s show may be the only one that wouldn&#8217;t be nearly as good without PP and is not a good example of PP problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

