<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Children of 9/11, Children of technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:01:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Tufte</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4648</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tufte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4648</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did anyone happen to see the classic episode of &quot;Malcom In the Middle&quot; where the dad and son build a society out of action figures and building blocks ... and then the little boy turns into a despot? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sounds like the shed is going in this direction.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone happen to see the classic episode of &quot;Malcom In the Middle&quot; where the dad and son build a society out of action figures and building blocks &#8230; and then the little boy turns into a despot? </p>
<p>Sounds like the shed is going in this direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamist Blog</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4651</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamist Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4651</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Keep Out&lt;/strong&gt;

In a fascinating post, Grant McCracken explains how some 21st-century kids secured their secret clubhouse. No printed signs were involved....

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Keep Out</strong></p>
<p>In a fascinating post, Grant McCracken explains how some 21st-century kids secured their secret clubhouse. No printed signs were involved&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4647</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dilys and Matt, I asked Pam and she thinks that not even the oldest one (who is 8) uses a password to access a computer.  Her mum may clarify.  Thanks, Grant&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter, I happen to know Charles Ravioli and he doesn&#039;t have any time for me either.  I am this close to saying, Charlie, I don&#039;t care if you are imaginery, you&#039;ve got to get in the loop.  Thanks, Grant&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;John, Good spot.  The flag is vertical bands of yellow, red and blue.  I agree with you, I really do think they were thinking in terms of soverignty.  Thanks, Grant&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dilys and Matt, I asked Pam and she thinks that not even the oldest one (who is <img src='http://cultureby.com/cco/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> uses a password to access a computer.  Her mum may clarify.  Thanks, Grant</p>
<p>Peter, I happen to know Charles Ravioli and he doesn&#39;t have any time for me either.  I am this close to saying, Charlie, I don&#39;t care if you are imaginery, you&#39;ve got to get in the loop.  Thanks, Grant</p>
<p>John, Good spot.  The flag is vertical bands of yellow, red and blue.  I agree with you, I really do think they were thinking in terms of soverignty.  Thanks, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Galvin</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>John Galvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree with the comments that these four- (and other-) year-olds are merely mimicking/mirroring a familiarity with computer passwords.  First off, at least one of them was four.  Do four-year-olds these days have their own usernames and passwords or do parents log them on?  (I ask in earnest; I do not know and am not lucky enough to be close to any four-year-olds.)  I mean, I never pretended I had a social security number when I was 4.  (I don&#039;t think -- better ask my mom.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Second, the kids&#039; level of security is HIGHER than we routinely face when using passwords, so there is at the very least exaggeration present even if their base behavior is &quot;merely&quot; mimickry.  You either have to use a username and password (to get your gmail) or you have to use your PIN (to get your money out of the wall).  We almost never have to have a special word and a special number IN ADDITION to already being ourselves (as most usernames are based on names/nicknames).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, and most convincing to me, they made a flag.  When I was a kid, we had clubs and teams and pretend identities -- but we never had a sovereign nation whose borders we enforced.  What colors were on the flag, Grant?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The comments so far are true, and of course there&#039;s some mimickry going on, but Grant&#039;s right -- there&#039;s more going on here.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the comments that these four- (and other-) year-olds are merely mimicking/mirroring a familiarity with computer passwords.  First off, at least one of them was four.  Do four-year-olds these days have their own usernames and passwords or do parents log them on?  (I ask in earnest; I do not know and am not lucky enough to be close to any four-year-olds.)  I mean, I never pretended I had a social security number when I was 4.  (I don&#39;t think &#8212; better ask my mom.)</p>
<p>Second, the kids&#39; level of security is HIGHER than we routinely face when using passwords, so there is at the very least exaggeration present even if their base behavior is &quot;merely&quot; mimickry.  You either have to use a username and password (to get your gmail) or you have to use your PIN (to get your money out of the wall).  We almost never have to have a special word and a special number IN ADDITION to already being ourselves (as most usernames are based on names/nicknames).</p>
<p>Finally, and most convincing to me, they made a flag.  When I was a kid, we had clubs and teams and pretend identities &#8212; but we never had a sovereign nation whose borders we enforced.  What colors were on the flag, Grant?</p>
<p>The comments so far are true, and of course there&#39;s some mimickry going on, but Grant&#39;s right &#8212; there&#39;s more going on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linkage</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4650</link>
		<dc:creator>linkage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4650</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;http://www.abstractdynamics.org/linkage/archives/007521.html&lt;/strong&gt;

This Blog Sits at the: Children of 9/11, Children of technology...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.abstractdynamics.org/linkage/archives/007521.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.abstractdynamics.org/linkage/archives/007521.html</a></strong></p>
<p>This Blog Sits at the: Children of 9/11, Children of technology&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The TrueTalk Blog</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4649</link>
		<dc:creator>The TrueTalk Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4649</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Permeable?&lt;/strong&gt;

I had a great dinner and conversation last evening with Michael Montes, the guy who composed the music for the title sequences for the last two TED conferences. We met fortuitously at the San Jose airport on our way to

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Permeable?</strong></p>
<p>I had a great dinner and conversation last evening with Michael Montes, the guy who composed the music for the title sequences for the last two TED conferences. We met fortuitously at the San Jose airport on our way to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4645</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I view this as part of the human impulse to be exclusive (Maslow&#039;s stage of self-actualisation) - of creating a boundary and saying everything within that boundary is special (the boundary could be anything - a religion, a political party, a social class, a social anti-class etc).  Boundaries define the people who are &quot;in&quot; just as much as they define the people who are &quot;out&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I view this as part of the human impulse to be exclusive (Maslow&#39;s stage of self-actualisation) &#8211; of creating a boundary and saying everything within that boundary is special (the boundary could be anything &#8211; a religion, a political party, a social class, a social anti-class etc).  Boundaries define the people who are &quot;in&quot; just as much as they define the people who are &quot;out&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4644</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4644</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you think their education doesn&#039;t &quot;bristle with security&quot; then you haven&#039;t been inside a school very recently. The major remaining distinction between school and prison is that in the former, the inhabitants are allowed to leave at night.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree with dilys, though, that this is more likely to be a function of familiarity with the virtual border of a computer login prompt than anything relating to 9/11 or similar events.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think their education doesn&#39;t &quot;bristle with security&quot; then you haven&#39;t been inside a school very recently. The major remaining distinction between school and prison is that in the former, the inhabitants are allowed to leave at night.</p>
<p>I agree with dilys, though, that this is more likely to be a function of familiarity with the virtual border of a computer login prompt than anything relating to 9/11 or similar events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4643</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4643</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Adam Gopnik, in The New Yorker a few years back, wrote about his 3-year-old daughter&#039;s imaginary friend, Charles Ravioli, who was always too busy to actually meet her, and with whom she had to communicate with via (imaginary) voice mail, or via his (imaginary) assistant. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(&quot;Bumping into Mr. Ravioli&quot;, issue of 2002-09-30:  tried to find it online, but no luck!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Gopnik, in The New Yorker a few years back, wrote about his 3-year-old daughter&#39;s imaginary friend, Charles Ravioli, who was always too busy to actually meet her, and with whom she had to communicate with via (imaginary) voice mail, or via his (imaginary) assistant. </p>
<p>(&quot;Bumping into Mr. Ravioli&quot;, issue of 2002-09-30:  tried to find it online, but no luck!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dilys</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/03/_yesterday_pam_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4642</link>
		<dc:creator>dilys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-4642</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is directly related to their familiarity with computer passwords.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is directly related to their familiarity with computer passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
