<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Golfing, Phil Mickelson, and the American corporation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golf Platzrief</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html/comment-page-1#comment-4700</link>
		<dc:creator>Golf Platzrief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=718#comment-4700</guid>
		<description>Love the blog and love Michelson. You DO know what you are talking about. I think the other companies are still seeing golf as a rich man&#039;s leisurely activity. I guess they never met all of the young players. . .Tiger?
Maybe we should get you on &quot;the links&quot; with Steve if you want a first hand account of the pain and glory and pain of the game.
(Don&#039;t take a camera!)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the blog and love Michelson. You DO know what you are talking about. I think the other companies are still seeing golf as a rich man&#8217;s leisurely activity. I guess they never met all of the young players. . .Tiger?<br />
Maybe we should get you on &#8220;the links&#8221; with Steve if you want a first hand account of the pain and glory and pain of the game.<br />
(Don&#8217;t take a camera!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html/comment-page-1#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=718#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>Love the blog and love Michelson.  You DO know what you are talking about.  I think the other companies are still seeing golf as a rich man&#039;s leisurely activity.  I guess they never met all of the young players. . .Tiger?
Maybe we should get you on &quot;the links&quot; with Steve if you want a first hand account of the pain and glory and pain of the game.
(Don&#039;t take a camera!)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the blog and love Michelson.  You DO know what you are talking about.  I think the other companies are still seeing golf as a rich man&#8217;s leisurely activity.  I guess they never met all of the young players. . .Tiger?<br />
Maybe we should get you on &#8220;the links&#8221; with Steve if you want a first hand account of the pain and glory and pain of the game.<br />
(Don&#8217;t take a camera!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Dobscha</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html/comment-page-1#comment-4698</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Dobscha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=718#comment-4698</guid>
		<description>Hey Grant (we met and had dinner at ACR in Portland with Susan Fournier, Jonathan Schroeder and Janet Borgeson) I won&#039;t chastise you too much for not including your email address on your blog because maybe I&#039;m just too dense to find it but I wanted to say hello and let you know that my students at Bentley started a blog this semester in which each of them tracked a marketing blog and wrote their thoughts about individual postings.
I included the url so maybe you could check it out and comment on the use of blogs in the classroom.  They&#039;ve been pretty pleased with the response from their &quot;parent&quot; bloggers, many of whom have responded to their comments.
Hope to catch up with you soon (Orlando, perhaps?)
Susan Dobscha, Associate Professor of Marketing, Bentley College
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Grant (we met and had dinner at ACR in Portland with Susan Fournier, Jonathan Schroeder and Janet Borgeson) I won&#8217;t chastise you too much for not including your email address on your blog because maybe I&#8217;m just too dense to find it but I wanted to say hello and let you know that my students at Bentley started a blog this semester in which each of them tracked a marketing blog and wrote their thoughts about individual postings.</p>
<p>I included the url so maybe you could check it out and comment on the use of blogs in the classroom.  They&#8217;ve been pretty pleased with the response from their &#8220;parent&#8221; bloggers, many of whom have responded to their comments.</p>
<p>Hope to catch up with you soon (Orlando, perhaps?)</p>
<p>Susan Dobscha, Associate Professor of Marketing, Bentley College</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Acid</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html/comment-page-1#comment-4697</link>
		<dc:creator>Major Acid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=718#comment-4697</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t suppose you have a particular corporation or 10 in mind?  Certainly not any of the corporations that are pillaging Iraq at the moment, like Haliburton ... they may be nimble, but they are still pillagers.  Mind you, the talents that make a successful criminal organization successful are the same talents that make non-criminal corporations successful, too, I suspect.
And what about all those American corporations that are withering before our eyes, like the auto companies that are anything but &quot;nimble&quot; and &quot;dynamic&quot;, especially compared to some of their non-American competitors?
There probably are great American corporations, and no doubt a corporation with great leadership and a dynamic workforce could go a long way to solving political problems (in the USA as well as any of the countries you mentioned for comic effect)if directed to do so ... but they won&#039;t because political problems are not what corporations are designed to solve.
And torturing Phil Mickelson into the mix ... not all that helpful.  He still seems successful as much in spite of himself as because of himself.  He is changing, though, and I suppose that is a sign of a successful corporation, too ... the willingness and ability to change to thrive.
Okay, I&#039;ll give you the Mickelson thing.  But the blanket enthusiasm for corporations?  Not so much.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t suppose you have a particular corporation or 10 in mind?  Certainly not any of the corporations that are pillaging Iraq at the moment, like Haliburton &#8230; they may be nimble, but they are still pillagers.  Mind you, the talents that make a successful criminal organization successful are the same talents that make non-criminal corporations successful, too, I suspect.</p>
<p>And what about all those American corporations that are withering before our eyes, like the auto companies that are anything but &#8220;nimble&#8221; and &#8220;dynamic&#8221;, especially compared to some of their non-American competitors?</p>
<p>There probably are great American corporations, and no doubt a corporation with great leadership and a dynamic workforce could go a long way to solving political problems (in the USA as well as any of the countries you mentioned for comic effect)if directed to do so &#8230; but they won&#8217;t because political problems are not what corporations are designed to solve.</p>
<p>And torturing Phil Mickelson into the mix &#8230; not all that helpful.  He still seems successful as much in spite of himself as because of himself.  He is changing, though, and I suppose that is a sign of a successful corporation, too &#8230; the willingness and ability to change to thrive.</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll give you the Mickelson thing.  But the blanket enthusiasm for corporations?  Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html/comment-page-1#comment-4696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=718#comment-4696</guid>
		<description>I play golf. Not well, but I try. And I rail against the stagnant bureaucracies of my workplace in an effort to make us more responsive to our customers. Perhaps I am an exception.
For some, golf is indeed a bucolic recreation, nothing more. But the game is difficult enough that most who play it seem to be continually frustrated (and thus fascinated) by it. Since it is difficult, and since the physical ajustments required to play well are so minute and difficult to control, it is a highly mental game. Two competitive individuals playing a friendly round might appear to the oobserver to be relaxing on an artifically green island, but are likely to be struggling internally with course strategy, shot visualization, swing mechanics, and trying to hold down their own feelings of frustration which could destroy their tenuous grasp of technique.
These frustrations can lead players to forget the playing, and retreat into a hyperfocus on technique, but such a move rarely helps their play and these people usually abandon the game. In business, this might be the equivalent of becoming deadwood or holing up in a compliance-oriented part of the organization.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I play golf. Not well, but I try. And I rail against the stagnant bureaucracies of my workplace in an effort to make us more responsive to our customers. Perhaps I am an exception.</p>
<p>For some, golf is indeed a bucolic recreation, nothing more. But the game is difficult enough that most who play it seem to be continually frustrated (and thus fascinated) by it. Since it is difficult, and since the physical ajustments required to play well are so minute and difficult to control, it is a highly mental game. Two competitive individuals playing a friendly round might appear to the oobserver to be relaxing on an artifically green island, but are likely to be struggling internally with course strategy, shot visualization, swing mechanics, and trying to hold down their own feelings of frustration which could destroy their tenuous grasp of technique.</p>
<p>These frustrations can lead players to forget the playing, and retreat into a hyperfocus on technique, but such a move rarely helps their play and these people usually abandon the game. In business, this might be the equivalent of becoming deadwood or holing up in a compliance-oriented part of the organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html/comment-page-1#comment-4695</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=718#comment-4695</guid>
		<description>Anon, thanks for the head&#039;s up, the entire post was riddled with little imprecisions.  Typepad!  Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, thanks for the head&#8217;s up, the entire post was riddled with little imprecisions.  Typepad!  Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/04/golfing_phil_mi.html/comment-page-1#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=718#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>Grant, you appear to have some extraneous text in that last hyperlink to the Gaylord site.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant, you appear to have some extraneous text in that last hyperlink to the Gaylord site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

