<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chunky culture: the next new thing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2006/07/chunky_culture_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/chunky_culture_.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Winston O'Boogie</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/chunky_culture_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4292</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Winston O'Boogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=660#comment-4292</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t Nietzche who coined that much quoted (and misquoted) saying, it was TS Eliot:
&quot;Immature poets imitate, mature poets steal&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t Nietzche who coined that much quoted (and misquoted) saying, it was TS Eliot:</p>
<p>&#8220;Immature poets imitate, mature poets steal&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/chunky_culture_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=660#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>One key point is that the very difficulty of assembling large audiences means that those who can get at least a chunk will get a larger premium from advertisers of &quot;mass&quot; products (e.g. GEICO). In a fragmented world, aggolomeration earns a higher price per unit (though a smaller total amount because of smaller audience size) than it used to.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One key point is that the very difficulty of assembling large audiences means that those who can get at least a chunk will get a larger premium from advertisers of &#8220;mass&#8221; products (e.g. GEICO). In a fragmented world, aggolomeration earns a higher price per unit (though a smaller total amount because of smaller audience size) than it used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Berens</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/chunky_culture_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Berens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=660#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>Hi Grant,
Nice post on the, ahem, twilight zone between mass culture and niche culture.  It&#039;s interesting and perhaps revelatory that at the same time that the quasi-evolutionary narrative of an actor&#039;s career (soaps --&gt; TV --&gt; movies) has become scrambled so has the quasi-evolutionary narrative of how the average person uses the internet. Back in the day, it was &quot;AOL--&gt; another ISP without the walled garden --&gt; broadband.&quot; Now AOL is getting out of that business and the trajectory is up for grabs.  Do you see the similarity?
Best,
Brad
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Grant,<br />
Nice post on the, ahem, twilight zone between mass culture and niche culture.  It&#8217;s interesting and perhaps revelatory that at the same time that the quasi-evolutionary narrative of an actor&#8217;s career (soaps &#8211;> TV &#8211;> movies) has become scrambled so has the quasi-evolutionary narrative of how the average person uses the internet. Back in the day, it was &#8220;AOL&#8211;> another ISP without the walled garden &#8211;> broadband.&#8221; Now AOL is getting out of that business and the trajectory is up for grabs.  Do you see the similarity?<br />
Best,<br />
Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/chunky_culture_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4289</link>
		<dc:creator>SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=660#comment-4289</guid>
		<description>Could you maybe shorten your blog a little? It&#039;s cutting into my reading of other blogs...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you maybe shorten your blog a little? It&#8217;s cutting into my reading of other blogs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candy Minx</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/chunky_culture_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4288</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy Minx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=660#comment-4288</guid>
		<description>Ooh, I really enjoyed this post as I am a performer and writer...and you&#039;ve captured something here, I like the term chunky. There are a couple other things, you&#039;ve sort of noted that the consumer is controlling shows, true. We are enjoying smart tv. Plus, actors want to act. And what a way to constantly exercise than by a weekly tv show! And...it used to be that for a while some actors started out in tv. there was an idea, start in soap opera(Demi Moore, Kathleen Turner) &quot;advance&quot; to movies. Not any more. Tv is awesome. And...there is another reward...the strange concept of being a peoples actor, as well as an actors actor. popularity and mass audience with a huge tv show only competes with blockbuster movies for the sense of working for the people by the people. I am really looking forward to following these new tv shows.(already a bog fan of The Closer) Now getting a tv show is as fancy a cache as a blockbuster movie or a Cronenberg film.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, I really enjoyed this post as I am a performer and writer&#8230;and you&#8217;ve captured something here, I like the term chunky. There are a couple other things, you&#8217;ve sort of noted that the consumer is controlling shows, true. We are enjoying smart tv. Plus, actors want to act. And what a way to constantly exercise than by a weekly tv show! And&#8230;it used to be that for a while some actors started out in tv. there was an idea, start in soap opera(Demi Moore, Kathleen Turner) &#8220;advance&#8221; to movies. Not any more. Tv is awesome. And&#8230;there is another reward&#8230;the strange concept of being a peoples actor, as well as an actors actor. popularity and mass audience with a huge tv show only competes with blockbuster movies for the sense of working for the people by the people. I am really looking forward to following these new tv shows.(already a bog fan of The Closer) Now getting a tv show is as fancy a cache as a blockbuster movie or a Cronenberg film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

