<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Chunky Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2006/07/more_on_chunky_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/more_on_chunky_.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nelson</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/more_on_chunky_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4252</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=658#comment-4252</guid>
		<description>Not sure I get the idea of the middle being &quot;squeezed out&quot;.  This suggests the middle needs to be/remain a starting point rather than a desired destination.  I believe there will always be capital to fund artistic ventures as long as backers believe there is a reasonable chance of a return.  If anything, the risks entailed in producing &quot;massive hits&quot; are far greater now.  An artist with a track record or established audience, even if of moderate size, seems to be a pretty good risk hedge.  This may certainly require artists or content developers to spend more time in the farther reaches of the tail building their audience, but isn&#039;t this largely as it has always been, save the few who are annointed by the industry as the next thing?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I get the idea of the middle being &#8220;squeezed out&#8221;.  This suggests the middle needs to be/remain a starting point rather than a desired destination.  I believe there will always be capital to fund artistic ventures as long as backers believe there is a reasonable chance of a return.  If anything, the risks entailed in producing &#8220;massive hits&#8221; are far greater now.  An artist with a track record or established audience, even if of moderate size, seems to be a pretty good risk hedge.  This may certainly require artists or content developers to spend more time in the farther reaches of the tail building their audience, but isn&#8217;t this largely as it has always been, save the few who are annointed by the industry as the next thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livingbrands</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/07/more_on_chunky_.html/comment-page-1#comment-4253</link>
		<dc:creator>livingbrands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=658#comment-4253</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wagging the tail&lt;/strong&gt;
Chris Anderson&#039;s The Long Tail seems to be everyone&#039;s &#039;next book to read&#039; du jour. Have to admit I&#039;ve not yet read it (it&#039;s next on the list...). But the gist (simplistically), as most will now be aware given all
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wagging the tail</strong></p>
<p>Chris Anderson&#8217;s The Long Tail seems to be everyone&#8217;s &#8216;next book to read&#8217; du jour. Have to admit I&#8217;ve not yet read it (it&#8217;s next on the list&#8230;). But the gist (simplistically), as most will now be aware given all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

