<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mismatched obit pairs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2007/01/mismatched_obit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/mismatched_obit.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Postrel</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/mismatched_obit.html/comment-page-1#comment-3496</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Postrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=562#comment-3496</guid>
		<description>It sounds like (conventional) anthropology has trouble coming to terms with the fundamental fact of human diversity, at the individual not just the cultural level. In any  population as large as the U.S., it would be extraordinary not to find such variation. What&#039;s notable about our culture is that both can find niches that are both productive and respected. That I find that normatively desirable is, perhaps, why I wouldn&#039;t make much of an anthropologist.
While we&#039;re juxtaposing obits, here&#039;s a piece I wrote--nearly 10 years ago!--on the David Packard-Edmund Muskie contrast: http://www.reason.com/news/show/29956.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like (conventional) anthropology has trouble coming to terms with the fundamental fact of human diversity, at the individual not just the cultural level. In any  population as large as the U.S., it would be extraordinary not to find such variation. What&#8217;s notable about our culture is that both can find niches that are both productive and respected. That I find that normatively desirable is, perhaps, why I wouldn&#8217;t make much of an anthropologist.</p>
<p>While we&#8217;re juxtaposing obits, here&#8217;s a piece I wrote&#8211;nearly 10 years ago!&#8211;on the David Packard-Edmund Muskie contrast: <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/29956.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reason.com/news/show/29956.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Gee</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/mismatched_obit.html/comment-page-1#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=562#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>Grant, bloggers often find strange synchronicities, don&#039;t we?  I posted something about obits a few days ago: http://carol-sandy1.blogspot.com/2006/12/sharing-obits.html . I had not thought about the other mismatches, so cleverly illustrated with off socks.
BTW, Happy New Year!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant, bloggers often find strange synchronicities, don&#8217;t we?  I posted something about obits a few days ago: <a href="http://carol-sandy1.blogspot.com/2006/12/sharing-obits.html" rel="nofollow">http://carol-sandy1.blogspot.com/2006/12/sharing-obits.html</a> . I had not thought about the other mismatches, so cleverly illustrated with off socks.<br />
BTW, Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

