<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Charlie and Barney Show: birth of a new American male?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCracken: The Most Interesting Men In The World - PSFK</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-26842</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCracken: The Most Interesting Men In The World - PSFK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-26842</guid>
		<description>[...] We have noticed hyperbolic males here before. Charlie and Barnie, characters in Two and a Half Men and How I Met Your Mother, respectively, as played by Charlie Sheen and Neil Patrick Harris, respectively, are self-regarding males. But what marks them as males is not just the fact that they are self self aggrandizing, but a still deeper cynicism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have noticed hyperbolic males here before. Charlie and Barnie, characters in Two and a Half Men and How I Met Your Mother, respectively, as played by Charlie Sheen and Neil Patrick Harris, respectively, are self-regarding males. But what marks them as males is not just the fact that they are self self aggrandizing, but a still deeper cynicism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The most interesting men in the world</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-26836</link>
		<dc:creator>The most interesting men in the world</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 14:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-26836</guid>
		<description>[...] We have noticed hyperbolic males here before. &#160;Charlie and Barnie, characters in Two and a Half Men and How I Met Your Mother, respectively, as played by Charlie Sheen and Neil Patrick Harris, respectively, are self-regarding males. &#160;But what marks them as males is not just the fact that they are self self aggrandizing, but a still deeper cynicism. &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have noticed hyperbolic males here before. &#160;Charlie and Barnie, characters in Two and a Half Men and How I Met Your Mother, respectively, as played by Charlie Sheen and Neil Patrick Harris, respectively, are self-regarding males. &#160;But what marks them as males is not just the fact that they are self self aggrandizing, but a still deeper cynicism. &#160; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. L.</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-3494</link>
		<dc:creator>E. L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-3494</guid>
		<description>Shameless narcissism a step up in evolution? Really?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shameless narcissism a step up in evolution? Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter spear</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-3493</link>
		<dc:creator>peter spear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-3493</guid>
		<description>can&#039;t say i&#039;ve seen that show, but have marveled at it&#039;s success from a distance. (That&#039;s not true. as an american, i&#039;ve lost my ability to marvel).
But I couldn&#039;t agree more with the notion that the American male and the ideas of masculinity are in flux at the moment. i think what&#039;s fascinating about TV as a mirror to masculinity is that, for the most part, content on family/comedic TV has historically been directed (by advertising at least) towards a neutralization of traditional masculinity for a female audience. (i&#039;m open to this being patently wrong)
I also think that feminism and identity politics of the 90s has created an environment where masculinity is almost always a detriment of power - the brutish, helpless neanderthal that would die without the ingenuity and stalwart instincts of a strong woman.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t say i&#8217;ve seen that show, but have marveled at it&#8217;s success from a distance. (That&#8217;s not true. as an american, i&#8217;ve lost my ability to marvel).</p>
<p>But I couldn&#8217;t agree more with the notion that the American male and the ideas of masculinity are in flux at the moment. i think what&#8217;s fascinating about TV as a mirror to masculinity is that, for the most part, content on family/comedic TV has historically been directed (by advertising at least) towards a neutralization of traditional masculinity for a female audience. (i&#8217;m open to this being patently wrong)</p>
<p>I also think that feminism and identity politics of the 90s has created an environment where masculinity is almost always a detriment of power &#8211; the brutish, helpless neanderthal that would die without the ingenuity and stalwart instincts of a strong woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mega-much</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>mega-much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>I agree.Charlie Sheen is patetic.Here in spanish culture knows like a &#039;chulo&#039;.(a man who lives for prostitutes)But the other rol(Barney)maybe is worst.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.Charlie Sheen is patetic.Here in spanish culture knows like a &#8216;chulo&#8217;.(a man who lives for prostitutes)But the other rol(Barney)maybe is worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pramila</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-3491</link>
		<dc:creator>Pramila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-3491</guid>
		<description>Hi there,
My first time here...
my two cents worth : Maybe, just maybe Charlie and Barney are tolerable ...even kinda likable cause they are &#039;funny&#039; or made out to be - being witty may not come to a &#039;Charlie&#039; in real life - but in reel life where lines are fed to him - he is funny.
and its human nature to like, to accept one that makes you laugh..
also unlike the character on The Office - the Charlies of the sitcom world have a &quot;caring&quot; side to them - of course revealed only when young nephews are involved - here the length of the sitcom, where the viewer gets conned into getting to know the &#039;real&#039; charlie.
the english counterparts however usually have no such redeeming qualities.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>My first time here&#8230;</p>
<p>my two cents worth : Maybe, just maybe Charlie and Barney are tolerable &#8230;even kinda likable cause they are &#8216;funny&#8217; or made out to be &#8211; being witty may not come to a &#8216;Charlie&#8217; in real life &#8211; but in reel life where lines are fed to him &#8211; he is funny.<br />
and its human nature to like, to accept one that makes you laugh..</p>
<p>also unlike the character on The Office &#8211; the Charlies of the sitcom world have a &#8220;caring&#8221; side to them &#8211; of course revealed only when young nephews are involved &#8211; here the length of the sitcom, where the viewer gets conned into getting to know the &#8216;real&#8217; charlie.<br />
the english counterparts however usually have no such redeeming qualities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-3490</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-3490</guid>
		<description>Jaynie, perfect, I was wondering whether Wendie Malick (sp) in the new show Big Day might also qualify.  Thanks!  Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaynie, perfect, I was wondering whether Wendie Malick (sp) in the new show Big Day might also qualify.  Thanks!  Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaynie</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-3489</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaynie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-3489</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d offer that this is why Kim Catrall as Samantha on Sex and the City was such a shock of a character-- in her portrayal of the even more rare Unapologetic Female.
Moreover, in her &quot;balls to the walls,&quot; sexually brazen attitude, she almost took on a Unapologetic-Male-As-Played-By-A-Female role even more so than carving out a new niche within her gender.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d offer that this is why Kim Catrall as Samantha on Sex and the City was such a shock of a character&#8211; in her portrayal of the even more rare Unapologetic Female.</p>
<p>Moreover, in her &#8220;balls to the walls,&#8221; sexually brazen attitude, she almost took on a Unapologetic-Male-As-Played-By-A-Female role even more so than carving out a new niche within her gender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Guarriello</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/01/the_charlie_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-3488</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Guarriello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=561#comment-3488</guid>
		<description>Oh...I think the nostalgic longing for &quot;the good old days&quot; is much of it, Grant. These guys seem to represent a species of wish fulfillment (for both sexes?) that we can&#039;t get enough of.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;I think the nostalgic longing for &#8220;the good old days&#8221; is much of it, Grant. These guys seem to represent a species of wish fulfillment (for both sexes?) that we can&#8217;t get enough of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

