<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cate Blanchett: brand exemplar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2007/02/cate_blanchett_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/cate_blanchett_.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp2506</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/cate_blanchett_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>jp2506</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=531#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>UGG Millcreek
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGG Millcreek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idnca</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/cate_blanchett_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3301</link>
		<dc:creator>idnca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=531#comment-3301</guid>
		<description>Very interesting ideas regarding contemporary brands. I wanted to point to the fact that beyond the charming K. Blanchett this paradoxical, ambiguous and polyphonic - as Bakhtin would call it - nature of brands has been rather well described in recent literature against marketing mainstream doxa. I think mostly of 2 examples right now.
Firstly,  S. Brown (2005) hilarious deconstruction of Ryanair branding strategy, labeled &quot;paradessence&quot; in reference to Alex Shakar&#039;s The Savage Girl (2001) in which paradessence means the ability to combine 2 apparently mutually exclusive states and satisfy both simultaneously. For example coffee can be said to be both stimulation and relaxation. (Shakar, 72-73). So contra USP, brand kernel, DNA and other metaphors of stability and essentialism, Brown insists on the ambivalent and paradoxical meaning of brand discourses which can trigger various interpretations.
Secondly, Csaba &amp; Bengtsson (2005), very accurately contrast the problematic use of the &quot;identity&quot; reference in most branding literature. They demonstrate how such a complex conceptual notion referring to various disciplinary fields like philosophy, sociology, psychology or organization studies remains poorly explicited in marketing and relies on dubious assumptions (e.g. essentialism, stability, proprietary qualities) that solid contemporary research in social sciences regarding the problematic of self and cultural identity lead us to question by insisting on relational, contingent, narrative dimensions. (e.g. Giddens, Castells, Bauman)
Around the notion of identity, both articles aim at contrasting a popular, simplistic and utilitarian managerial view of brands with a properly informed cultural understanding of consumers and citizens subjectivity in relations to brands.
References:
- Brown, S. Ambi-brand culture, On a wing and swear with Ryanair.
- Csaba, F., Bengtsson, A., Rethinking identity in Brand Management.
Both articles in Brand Culture (2005) by Jonathan Schroeder, Miriam Salzer-Morling (editors)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting ideas regarding contemporary brands. I wanted to point to the fact that beyond the charming K. Blanchett this paradoxical, ambiguous and polyphonic &#8211; as Bakhtin would call it &#8211; nature of brands has been rather well described in recent literature against marketing mainstream doxa. I think mostly of 2 examples right now.</p>
<p>Firstly,  S. Brown (2005) hilarious deconstruction of Ryanair branding strategy, labeled &#8220;paradessence&#8221; in reference to Alex Shakar&#8217;s The Savage Girl (2001) in which paradessence means the ability to combine 2 apparently mutually exclusive states and satisfy both simultaneously. For example coffee can be said to be both stimulation and relaxation. (Shakar, 72-73). So contra USP, brand kernel, DNA and other metaphors of stability and essentialism, Brown insists on the ambivalent and paradoxical meaning of brand discourses which can trigger various interpretations.</p>
<p>Secondly, Csaba &#038; Bengtsson (2005), very accurately contrast the problematic use of the &#8220;identity&#8221; reference in most branding literature. They demonstrate how such a complex conceptual notion referring to various disciplinary fields like philosophy, sociology, psychology or organization studies remains poorly explicited in marketing and relies on dubious assumptions (e.g. essentialism, stability, proprietary qualities) that solid contemporary research in social sciences regarding the problematic of self and cultural identity lead us to question by insisting on relational, contingent, narrative dimensions. (e.g. Giddens, Castells, Bauman)</p>
<p>Around the notion of identity, both articles aim at contrasting a popular, simplistic and utilitarian managerial view of brands with a properly informed cultural understanding of consumers and citizens subjectivity in relations to brands.</p>
<p>References:<br />
- Brown, S. Ambi-brand culture, On a wing and swear with Ryanair.<br />
- Csaba, F., Bengtsson, A., Rethinking identity in Brand Management.<br />
Both articles in Brand Culture (2005) by Jonathan Schroeder, Miriam Salzer-Morling (editors)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiny gigantic</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/cate_blanchett_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3303</link>
		<dc:creator>tiny gigantic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=531#comment-3303</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Brand character&lt;/strong&gt;
Over at This Blog Sits at the, theres a good post on building reputation and identity in a way that defies traditional branding logic.
Heres how it starts:
When theatre people say why Cate Blanchett is a good actress, they say she is:
...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Brand character</strong></p>
<p>Over at This Blog Sits at the, theres a good post on building reputation and identity in a way that defies traditional branding logic.<br />
Heres how it starts:</p>
<p>When theatre people say why Cate Blanchett is a good actress, they say she is:<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandflakesforbreakfast</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/cate_blanchett_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3300</link>
		<dc:creator>brandflakesforbreakfast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=531#comment-3300</guid>
		<description>Brilliant thinking as usual Grant.
I look at those six qualities, and believe they might also describe talented creative people in our business. (Or at least the desired qualities of talented creative people.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant thinking as usual Grant.</p>
<p>I look at those six qualities, and believe they might also describe talented creative people in our business. (Or at least the desired qualities of talented creative people.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Postrel</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/cate_blanchett_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3299</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Postrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=531#comment-3299</guid>
		<description>feed://grant7.typepad.com/trilogy/index.rdf
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="feed://grant7.typepad.com/trilogy/index.rdf" rel="nofollow">feed://grant7.typepad.com/trilogy/index.rdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepita</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/cate_blanchett_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3298</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=531#comment-3298</guid>
		<description>No feed? Or am I overlooking it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No feed? Or am I overlooking it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

