<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Films and the reinvention of football</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Postrel</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3342</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Postrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=535#comment-3342</guid>
		<description>On a related note, Rich Karlgaard of Forbes predicts a great future for hockey and soccer: &quot;Hockey and soccer -- They gain popularity. Why? Large flat-panel televisions. Fast-moving goal sports are hard to follow on small TVs. The action turns compelling on 50-inch or larger high-definition LCD or plasma screens. Americans who are old enough remember how boring football was on TV before color and instant replay. With their advent the NFL&#039;s popularity exploded in the 1960s.&quot; Posted  here: http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/09/technology-2007-predictions-sneakpeek_sp07_04_richkarlgaard_technology.html
Of course, some people (like my husband, posting above) never found football boring, even before color and instant replay.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a related note, Rich Karlgaard of Forbes predicts a great future for hockey and soccer: &#8220;Hockey and soccer &#8212; They gain popularity. Why? Large flat-panel televisions. Fast-moving goal sports are hard to follow on small TVs. The action turns compelling on 50-inch or larger high-definition LCD or plasma screens. Americans who are old enough remember how boring football was on TV before color and instant replay. With their advent the NFL&#8217;s popularity exploded in the 1960s.&#8221; Posted  here: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/09/technology-2007-predictions-sneakpeek_sp07_04_richkarlgaard_technology.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/09/technology-2007-predictions-sneakpeek_sp07_04_richkarlgaard_technology.html</a></p>
<p>Of course, some people (like my husband, posting above) never found football boring, even before color and instant replay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wagner</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=535#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>You forgot the biggest drivers of football&#039;s popularity:  Betting and the fact that it&#039;s a great sport for television (commercials).
Soccer isn&#039;t called the beautiful game for nothing.  Don&#039;t be a hater.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot the biggest drivers of football&#8217;s popularity:  Betting and the fact that it&#8217;s a great sport for television (commercials).</p>
<p>Soccer isn&#8217;t called the beautiful game for nothing.  Don&#8217;t be a hater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=535#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;ll take hockey any day of the week over football but that being said I think it&#039;s interesting that arguably the only really great sports movies happen to be about football (Any Given Sunday is a perfect example). I guess the set up of a football game is a perfect way of telling an intriguing and engaging story to its audience.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;ll take hockey any day of the week over football but that being said I think it&#8217;s interesting that arguably the only really great sports movies happen to be about football (Any Given Sunday is a perfect example). I guess the set up of a football game is a perfect way of telling an intriguing and engaging story to its audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Asacker</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3339</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Asacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=535#comment-3339</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a testimony to the outstanding storytelling and expression of the NFL games that they have almost no resemblance to my memory of playing football.  ;)
To witness the dramatic difference between the NFL and other sports like basketball, hockey and soccer, simpy watch a high school or small college game on TV and compare it to the professional version.  The dramatic gap is HUGE in football, but less so in those other sports.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a testimony to the outstanding storytelling and expression of the NFL games that they have almost no resemblance to my memory of playing football.  <img src='http://cultureby.com/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>To witness the dramatic difference between the NFL and other sports like basketball, hockey and soccer, simpy watch a high school or small college game on TV and compare it to the professional version.  The dramatic gap is HUGE in football, but less so in those other sports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=535#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re on to something here, Grant.
To me, the beauty of football is the orchestrated, dynamic nature of the action, lots of complex individual actions melding together to create a collective result. It was this high-speed geometry more than violence that first attracted me to the game--on the over-the-air, black-and-white signal I grew up watching the violence was too blurry to be explicit.
NFL films did romanticize and glamorize the game. The Wagnerian scripts used in the 1970s, the oracular voice of John Facenda, and most importantly, the brilliant choices for musical scores, provided an imagined backdrop even when watching live action. In my opinion, the more recent NFL Films work is not as compelling in terms of content. It also plays less of a role in marketing the game because of the plethora of competing NFL content.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re on to something here, Grant.</p>
<p>To me, the beauty of football is the orchestrated, dynamic nature of the action, lots of complex individual actions melding together to create a collective result. It was this high-speed geometry more than violence that first attracted me to the game&#8211;on the over-the-air, black-and-white signal I grew up watching the violence was too blurry to be explicit.</p>
<p>NFL films did romanticize and glamorize the game. The Wagnerian scripts used in the 1970s, the oracular voice of John Facenda, and most importantly, the brilliant choices for musical scores, provided an imagined backdrop even when watching live action. In my opinion, the more recent NFL Films work is not as compelling in terms of content. It also plays less of a role in marketing the game because of the plethora of competing NFL content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=535#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now, to be fair, football is not as bad as soccer, and that&#039;s because nothing is as bad as soccer.&quot;
This is an astonishingly parochial, American attitude, and globally a minority viewpoint.  It is also a huge reason we are bogged down in Iraq -- we are playing football, they are playing soccer, and they are winning.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now, to be fair, football is not as bad as soccer, and that&#8217;s because nothing is as bad as soccer.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is an astonishingly parochial, American attitude, and globally a minority viewpoint.  It is also a huge reason we are bogged down in Iraq &#8212; we are playing football, they are playing soccer, and they are winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=535#comment-3336</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the war quality. The gridiron is the closest thing in American sports to a battlefield. Men get off on football for basically the same reasons they get off on the battle scenes in &#039;Braveheart&#039;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the war quality. The gridiron is the closest thing in American sports to a battlefield. Men get off on football for basically the same reasons they get off on the battle scenes in &#8216;Braveheart&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gcruse</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/nfl_films_and_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>gcruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=535#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ll find the man&#039;s name is actually Roone Aldridge.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll find the man&#8217;s name is actually Roone Aldridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

