<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The attack on Russell Davies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2007/02/russell_davies.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/russell_davies.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My ID</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/02/russell_davies.html/comment-page-1#comment-3367</link>
		<dc:creator>My ID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=540#comment-3367</guid>
		<description>Man, in a post secondary context of time, people, and perspectives I am at this very moment of post-social wheourmantics 2.0 ashamed to be a fellow anthropologist.
(Dated today and in the non-whimsical sense of not being related to my freelance qual ad-land work; circa 2003 - present; UK, US, France, Bulgaria)
I guess to cut the schmooze (and in a serious script), your attempts to play down your IQ in the name of a ghost PR campaign in this raw &#039;new, new&#039; evolving brandsphere, is well, ummmm a tad sad. Even upsetting.
Whilst I and many others - dare I say yourself - are all for the experimentation and evolution of anthropology and it&#039;s somewhat dated / elitist methodology’s, let&#039;s forget the brand IP of a future conference/ book supporting blag/blog for the &#039;lesser mortals, and try to so this, the right way.
Please, drop the ad schmooze and funding of false knowledge and hit the library/ journals and give us what you were once great for. Please.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, in a post secondary context of time, people, and perspectives I am at this very moment of post-social wheourmantics 2.0 ashamed to be a fellow anthropologist.<br />
(Dated today and in the non-whimsical sense of not being related to my freelance qual ad-land work; circa 2003 &#8211; present; UK, US, France, Bulgaria)</p>
<p>I guess to cut the schmooze (and in a serious script), your attempts to play down your IQ in the name of a ghost PR campaign in this raw &#8216;new, new&#8217; evolving brandsphere, is well, ummmm a tad sad. Even upsetting.</p>
<p>Whilst I and many others &#8211; dare I say yourself &#8211; are all for the experimentation and evolution of anthropology and it&#8217;s somewhat dated / elitist methodology’s, let&#8217;s forget the brand IP of a future conference/ book supporting blag/blog for the &#8216;lesser mortals, and try to so this, the right way.</p>
<p>Please, drop the ad schmooze and funding of false knowledge and hit the library/ journals and give us what you were once great for. Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

