<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gaga over Geico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Alpha Mind</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/comment-page-1#comment-3224</link>
		<dc:creator>The Alpha Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=519#comment-3224</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Grant McCracken and Little Richard&lt;/strong&gt;
Grant McCracken is Gaga over Geico, and tells us why. Ill add something:
Theres a serious problem with using real customers, not celebrities to speak for a product, and its more acute in audio than in print, and worse...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Grant McCracken and Little Richard</strong></p>
<p>Grant McCracken is Gaga over Geico, and tells us why. Ill add something:<br />
Theres a serious problem with using real customers, not celebrities to speak for a product, and its more acute in audio than in print, and worse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Alpha Mind</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/comment-page-1#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>The Alpha Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=519#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Grant McCracken and Little Richard&lt;/strong&gt;
Grant McCracken is Gaga over Geico, and tells us why. Ill add something:
Theres a serious problem with using real customers, not celebrities to speak for a product, and its more acute in audio than in print, and worse...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Grant McCracken and Little Richard</strong></p>
<p>Grant McCracken is Gaga over Geico, and tells us why. Ill add something:<br />
Theres a serious problem with using real customers, not celebrities to speak for a product, and its more acute in audio than in print, and worse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Richardson</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/comment-page-1#comment-3223</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=519#comment-3223</guid>
		<description>Most insurance ads seem to fall into two categories:
Rewind: Showing how quickly they life back to normal. Usually illustrated by running the film or plot backward.
Random: Aflack duck anyone? Geico&#039;s ads largely fall into this category.
Reality: Sincere interviews and montages of local agents showing how they respond after tornadoes. State Farm has done a lot of this (did you know Barry Manilow did their jingle back in his early days?)
I hadn&#039;t thought about it before, but they advertise a heck of a lot. As Steve points out, the variety of Geico&#039;s ads stop them from being overly repetitive, as they would be if based on a single theme from any of the R&#039;s.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most insurance ads seem to fall into two categories:</p>
<p>Rewind: Showing how quickly they life back to normal. Usually illustrated by running the film or plot backward.<br />
Random: Aflack duck anyone? Geico&#8217;s ads largely fall into this category.<br />
Reality: Sincere interviews and montages of local agents showing how they respond after tornadoes. State Farm has done a lot of this (did you know Barry Manilow did their jingle back in his early days?)</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t thought about it before, but they advertise a heck of a lot. As Steve points out, the variety of Geico&#8217;s ads stop them from being overly repetitive, as they would be if based on a single theme from any of the R&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/comment-page-1#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=519#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been citing Geico a lot in these threads because I think it&#039;s a great example of an ad campaign that has the multiplicity Grant advocates at the tactical level while possessing stringent message discipline at the strategic level. I will bet just about everybody who watches football (huge buys for some reason for football) knows by now that Geico a) claims to have low rates b) that are easy to check and access on its website. The celebrity series is focused on a different aspect, superior claims service, which I suspect is not quite as driven into everyone&#039;s consciousness yet. And this is all wrapped up in the idea that the product is for smart people with a sense of humor.
The variety of their campaigns prevents the viewer from getting as bored and exasperated as he or she otherwise would--they really have been carpet-bombing us with a lot of messages. And it gives more chances for any given ad to click with a particular viewer, since potential customers are a heterorgeneous bunch. (Geico also runs some pretty funny radio ads, including one warning its low rates not to taunt and bully other companies&#039; rates and one parodying business strategy discussions.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been citing Geico a lot in these threads because I think it&#8217;s a great example of an ad campaign that has the multiplicity Grant advocates at the tactical level while possessing stringent message discipline at the strategic level. I will bet just about everybody who watches football (huge buys for some reason for football) knows by now that Geico a) claims to have low rates b) that are easy to check and access on its website. The celebrity series is focused on a different aspect, superior claims service, which I suspect is not quite as driven into everyone&#8217;s consciousness yet. And this is all wrapped up in the idea that the product is for smart people with a sense of humor.</p>
<p>The variety of their campaigns prevents the viewer from getting as bored and exasperated as he or she otherwise would&#8211;they really have been carpet-bombing us with a lot of messages. And it gives more chances for any given ad to click with a particular viewer, since potential customers are a heterorgeneous bunch. (Geico also runs some pretty funny radio ads, including one warning its low rates not to taunt and bully other companies&#8217; rates and one parodying business strategy discussions.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Denny</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/comment-page-1#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=519#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>... and don&#039;t forget Bob LaFontaine, &quot;that movie announcer guy&quot;, who seems downright pleased with himself after finishing off his dramatic reading. &quot;In a world... where BOTH of our cars were under water...&quot;
Frankly, I&#039;m not sure why Geico has three fairly incompatible ad campaigns running simultaneously. The gecko seems a bit strained, the cavemen felt like a one-off that has just gone on too far, and while the celebrity spokespeople are certainly entertaining (for the most part), I&#039;m not sure what they&#039;re delivering.
I wonder if all this is helping them sell more stuff.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and don&#8217;t forget Bob LaFontaine, &#8220;that movie announcer guy&#8221;, who seems downright pleased with himself after finishing off his dramatic reading. &#8220;In a world&#8230; where BOTH of our cars were under water&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m not sure why Geico has three fairly incompatible ad campaigns running simultaneously. The gecko seems a bit strained, the cavemen felt like a one-off that has just gone on too far, and while the celebrity spokespeople are certainly entertaining (for the most part), I&#8217;m not sure what they&#8217;re delivering.</p>
<p>I wonder if all this is helping them sell more stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: botogol</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/comment-page-1#comment-3220</link>
		<dc:creator>botogol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 06:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=519#comment-3220</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the British TV show &#039;Extras&#039;, by Ricky Gervais.  This also makes very novel, and subtly disturbing use of celebrities who appear on the show as &#039;themselves&#039;.... except they don&#039;t. They play a distorted, worrisome version of themselves.  Worth a look - especialyl series 2 with it&#039;s nested levels of meaning.
Here&#039;a review of one episode
http://danowen.blogspot.com/2006/10/extras-episode-6-series-2.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the British TV show &#8216;Extras&#8217;, by Ricky Gervais.  This also makes very novel, and subtly disturbing use of celebrities who appear on the show as &#8216;themselves&#8217;&#8230;. except they don&#8217;t. They play a distorted, worrisome version of themselves.  Worth a look &#8211; especialyl series 2 with it&#8217;s nested levels of meaning.<br />
Here&#8217;a review of one episode</p>
<p><a href="http://danowen.blogspot.com/2006/10/extras-episode-6-series-2.html" rel="nofollow">http://danowen.blogspot.com/2006/10/extras-episode-6-series-2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Portigal</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/comment-page-1#comment-3219</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Portigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=519#comment-3219</guid>
		<description>NYT on this series (and some others) - For Some Aging Actors, Self-Mockery Sells
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/business/media/01adco.html?ex=1330405200&amp;en=da5d881d21588129&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss
How can Geico develop three divergent ad campaigns (caveman, gekko, and celeb) that are strong and working independent of each other?
They all take an irreverent view of advertising, but this one goes all the way and makes fun of itself; advertising has long since co-opted parody!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYT on this series (and some others) &#8211; For Some Aging Actors, Self-Mockery Sells<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/business/media/01adco.html?ex=1330405200&#038;en=da5d881d21588129&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/business/media/01adco.html?ex=1330405200&#038;en=da5d881d21588129&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss</a></p>
<p>How can Geico develop three divergent ad campaigns (caveman, gekko, and celeb) that are strong and working independent of each other?</p>
<p>They all take an irreverent view of advertising, but this one goes all the way and makes fun of itself; advertising has long since co-opted parody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Richardson</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2007/03/gaga_over_geico.html/comment-page-1#comment-3218</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=519#comment-3218</guid>
		<description>Did you see the spot on The Daily Show after the state of the union address where they superimposed Bush on top of the Geico customer, and had Little Richard &quot;react&quot; to his statements on terrorism, danger, and &quot;don&#039;t worry be happy&quot;? It was one of the funniest things I&#039;ve ever seen. It was on YouTube, I think all that stuff has been yanked since.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see the spot on The Daily Show after the state of the union address where they superimposed Bush on top of the Geico customer, and had Little Richard &#8220;react&#8221; to his statements on terrorism, danger, and &#8220;don&#8217;t worry be happy&#8221;? It was one of the funniest things I&#8217;ve ever seen. It was on YouTube, I think all that stuff has been yanked since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

