Archive for January, 2008
Mark Cuban for President?
Posted by: | CommentsI am hearing lots of talk during the US primaries about change. But I haven`t yet heard any politician talk about digital politics.
We have seen the digital effect sweep through the economy, entertainment, sociality, culture and learning, to name a few. It is not unreasonable to suppose that this digital effect will come to politics, and that when it does it will transform things entirely.
After all, tthe digital effect is, first and foremost, a disintermediating revolution. And politics are about nothing if not mediation. The very idea of `representation` assumes a politician to devine and define our political wishes.
Well, I guess it is unreasonable to ask a politician who depends upon mediation to be the champion of disintermediation. But still, if the present candidates really want to look like leaders willing and able to take on the challenges of the present day, surely it is time for one of them to step forward with promises about the digital reinvention of politics.
I mean, we can work something out. We can grandfather them through to retirement. And the sooner they retire themselves, the better.
Dick Clark, ritual officer for the time traveler clan
Posted by: | Comments
It was painful to watch Dick Clark bring in the new year, wasn’t it? This guy was once the picture of unassuming, unaffected ease, a very democratic master of ceremonies. He is now diminished and laborious. At the stroke of midnight, he saluted us with "Happy Dew Year!"
We are a culture that is likes to move through time with dispatch. Most cultures think of time as a circle. We think of it as an arrow, whistling forward. The future interests us so keenly we are happy, actually eager, to say farewell to the past. Most cultures revere tradition. We practice amnesia. We like to keep moving.
So a new year’s ceremony is an important event in the ritual scheme of things. We acknowledge time moving with our only shared act of time marking. The world rushes together in unison for a moment before returning to the chaos that is our preferred condition. We rush together and then once more off in all directions. By Jan. 1 we have returned to our fractious, pell-mell, state of diversity, everyone careening off in pursuit of their very own 2008.
The ritual officer matters. We want someone who makes this liminal moment go smoothly. We want someone to bless our fleeting, uneasy, unlikely consensus with a certain grace. We want someone to bless our passage into a reckless, vortex-like future with a humor so reassuringly bland that peril seems unthinkable.
Dick Clark used to be perfect. Now he’s not. If I may anticipate the anthropologist of the 22nd century, this doesn’t look good. It might even be taken as a symptom. When a culture make its chief temporal officer a man who suffers diminished capacity, when it puts the ritual in the hands who someone who can’t quite discharge the ritual, this might be a sign of a new ambivalence.
And who’s to say this anthropologist is wrong. For myself, I am astonished by how fast things change, how responsive individuals and institutions have become, how hard and ceaselessly everyone works. The mid-century modernism of, say, 1950s America delighted in change. We were eager and optimistic. Fifty years later a certain exhaustion appears to be setting in. We head into a new years with the usual joy of anticipation, but there are notes of concern. If this is what the future looks like…wow, it’s really hard work.
So what do we do with the ritual, that relic of our unalloyed optimism? Small interventions will do for the moment. It reminds me of a Honda I saw in the 1980s. The factory had installed a decal in the back window that read, "Another Happy Honda!" The owner razored out the second word, so that now his car read "Another Honda!" Perfect. Maybe Dick Clark is just our man.
Post script:
New Year’s by the numbers:
ABC’s combination of theatrical Shrek 2 and Dick Clark’s Primetime New Year’s Rockin’ Eve finished first in prime-time on Monday, with an average 7.8 million viewers and a 2.4 rating/8 share among adults 18-49. Comparably, that beat the No.2 network (CBS in total viewers; Fox among adults 18-49) by a hefty 2.7 million viewers and 71 percent in the demo.
[Sorry, I have lost my source here. It might be from Marc Berman's The Programming Insider. Highly recommended.]
Acknowledgments:
Thanks to Tom and Karen Guarriello for sharing new years with us, and to Karen for the "Happy Dew Year" spot.
Thanks to Alan Light for the image of Dick Clark.
What’s a doggy-woggy II: the VOWEL award
Posted by: | Comments
Time is almost up for the essay contest announced a couple of weeks ago. You can find the announcement here.
Please get your submissions in. I am pushing the submission date forward to January 10.
Remember, there is a cash prize of $100.
There is also the stainless honor of being the first recipient of an AEIOU (aka Vowel) award. (This acronym stands for Account Planner, Anthropologist, Ethnographer, Insight and Observation Award.)
Um, the award is not yet officially named, and AEIOU may need some work. Any suggestions on alternatives? It should be playful and unassuming. But it should also look good on a CV, so that Human Relations at a big agency (or the managing partners of a small one) look at your credentials, and say, "so I see you won a Vowel. Tell me about that."
Award names should work in several of the following terms (and letters): creativity, innovation, account planning/er, anthropology/er, ethnography/er, insight, and observation, everyday life, and Russell Davies.
There is no prize for naming the prize.
All Clear
Posted by: | Comments
My apologies. This Blogs was down over the holidays. I think we are back to business as usual. Happy new year!

