<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The MIT ethnography course: my &#8220;pilot fish&#8221; model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2008/01/the-mit-ethnogr.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2008/01/the-mit-ethnogr.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Cox</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2008/01/the-mit-ethnogr.html/comment-page-1#comment-2217</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=356#comment-2217</guid>
		<description>For linking to powerpoints you might want to try slideshare http://www.slideshare.net/
Which is like a flickr for your powerpoint presentations.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For linking to powerpoints you might want to try slideshare <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/</a><br />
Which is like a flickr for your powerpoint presentations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2008/01/the-mit-ethnogr.html/comment-page-1#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=356#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>&quot;And I am left with a puzzle: how can a social science committed to a honest, open discourse manage to produce so little intellectual variety?&quot;
The reason is academic peer review, which rewards the pedantic and micro-incremental at the expense of the bold and the original.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And I am left with a puzzle: how can a social science committed to a honest, open discourse manage to produce so little intellectual variety?&#8221;</p>
<p>The reason is academic peer review, which rewards the pedantic and micro-incremental at the expense of the bold and the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

