<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blender Magazine RIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2009/03/blender-magazine-rip.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/03/blender-magazine-rip.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Roberts</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/03/blender-magazine-rip.html/comment-page-1#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=114#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Blender was pretty. I took it for a year and let it lapse. Reason? The music reviews were not critical, they all seemed like a sales pitch. I&#039;ve noticed this has moved on to Entertainment Weekly and my beloved Rolling Stone where hardly anyone gets below a 3 stars anymore. Is all this music really that good (everything is above average!)? Or do the reviewers not know enough about &quot;what the kids are listening to,&quot; or are they just unwilling to expose the emperor&#039;s nudity because they are corrupted by advertising and celebrity rub-ups? BTW, Grant, love the blogs, (best, Scott Roberts!)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blender was pretty. I took it for a year and let it lapse. Reason? The music reviews were not critical, they all seemed like a sales pitch. I&#8217;ve noticed this has moved on to Entertainment Weekly and my beloved Rolling Stone where hardly anyone gets below a 3 stars anymore. Is all this music really that good (everything is above average!)? Or do the reviewers not know enough about &#8220;what the kids are listening to,&#8221; or are they just unwilling to expose the emperor&#8217;s nudity because they are corrupted by advertising and celebrity rub-ups? BTW, Grant, love the blogs, (best, Scott Roberts!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

