A new consumer emerging?
ByI found this comment a couple of days ago. It bears on whether an economic downturn can refashion consumer taste and preference. Janice Castro puts it this way.
The trouble is Castro made this argument in 2001, on the eve of one of the greatest moments of consumer enthusiasm in the history of the American economy. Castro wasn't just wrong. She was spectacularly wrong.
We don't know what will happen as a result of the current downturn, but this time around we should avoid rushing to conclusions.
References
Castro, Janice. 2001. “Cover Stories: The Simple Life Goodbye to having it all.” Time Magazine. June 24 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,156757,00.html (Accessed April 5, 2009).



She could simply have called the inflection a little early
A good point, Grant. One of the biggest failings of our 24-hour news cycle world is endlessly rushing to conclusions. Perhaps we should all follow Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s model and only look at news every couple of weeks or so—the principle being that a story that survives our not paying attention to it for at least a fortnight is probably worth paying attention to.
I’ve read a lot lately about the economy permanently affecting consumer behavior. Is this a probability or wishful thinking? I’m inclined to go with the latter. The need to acquire, for status reasons or security or whatever, seems to be pretty deeply embedded. It’s a big leap from people trading down (out of necessity) and saying they “want” to reduce their attachments. What I see in my personal everyday are people waiting for life to return to pre-recession conditions. They see the downturn as a rude interruption, not a game-changer. Of course, I could be misinterpreting what I see. And maybe people will change if the recession goes on long enough. All of this is to say that I couldn’t agree more, Grant. Who really knows what’s going to happen?