<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kindle anti-incendiary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2009/05/kindle-anti-incendiary.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/05/kindle-anti-incendiary.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/05/kindle-anti-incendiary.html/comment-page-1#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=96#comment-790</guid>
		<description>And if a book goes out of copyright, Amazon can reach right in and retract it, without your permission or knowledge. Ironically, when this was done recently, it was with Orwell&#039;s 1984 and Animal Farm. Old media-ish with a shiny new techno-twist.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if a book goes out of copyright, Amazon can reach right in and retract it, without your permission or knowledge. Ironically, when this was done recently, it was with Orwell&#8217;s 1984 and Animal Farm. Old media-ish with a shiny new techno-twist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Guarriello</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/05/kindle-anti-incendiary.html/comment-page-1#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Guarriello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=96#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Well, they did take a baby step into the new world today.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/26/kindle-notes-and-highlights-now-accessible-on-the-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/26/kindle-notes-and-highlights-now-accessible-on-the-web/&lt;/a&gt;
Still pretty closed down but getting better.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they did take a baby step into the new world today.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/26/kindle-notes-and-highlights-now-accessible-on-the-web/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/26/kindle-notes-and-highlights-now-accessible-on-the-web/</a></p>
<p>Still pretty closed down but getting better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Alkon</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/05/kindle-anti-incendiary.html/comment-page-1#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Alkon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=96#comment-788</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you sell books you link to through Amazon on your site (I have a whole store and get kickbacks -- have sold over $2K this month in my &quot;Amy&#039;s Mall&quot;), but Amazon has made a huge mistake by making Kindle books the one thing bloggers get no kickback on. If I send Amazon a customer who buys a paper and cardboard book, I get 6.5 or 7 percent of the purchase price. If I send Amazon a customer who buys a Kindle book, I get ZERO. I&#039;ve approached the Kindle team about this and they&#039;ve approached the Associates team (the people in charge of website kickback program) and the Associates aren&#039;t budging. I&#039;ve written to Bezos (last week). I don&#039;t get it. This is supposed to be the future of books, and it requires no shipping, and it&#039;s the one thing they&#039;re cutting bloggers out of? When we send them customers? What do you think is up with this? Greed? Stupidity?
PS Boyfriend thinks Mac will be out with a reader that eats Kindle&#039;s lunch.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you sell books you link to through Amazon on your site (I have a whole store and get kickbacks &#8212; have sold over $2K this month in my &#8220;Amy&#8217;s Mall&#8221;), but Amazon has made a huge mistake by making Kindle books the one thing bloggers get no kickback on. If I send Amazon a customer who buys a paper and cardboard book, I get 6.5 or 7 percent of the purchase price. If I send Amazon a customer who buys a Kindle book, I get ZERO. I&#8217;ve approached the Kindle team about this and they&#8217;ve approached the Associates team (the people in charge of website kickback program) and the Associates aren&#8217;t budging. I&#8217;ve written to Bezos (last week). I don&#8217;t get it. This is supposed to be the future of books, and it requires no shipping, and it&#8217;s the one thing they&#8217;re cutting bloggers out of? When we send them customers? What do you think is up with this? Greed? Stupidity?</p>
<p>PS Boyfriend thinks Mac will be out with a reader that eats Kindle&#8217;s lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/05/kindle-anti-incendiary.html/comment-page-1#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=96#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Thought you might be interested in my friend&#039;s partial solution to this problem:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.vedana.net/2009/05/easy-kindle-clippings.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://weblog.vedana.net/2009/05/easy-kindle-clippings.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought you might be interested in my friend&#8217;s partial solution to this problem:</p>
<p><a href="http://weblog.vedana.net/2009/05/easy-kindle-clippings.html" rel="nofollow">http://weblog.vedana.net/2009/05/easy-kindle-clippings.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Asacker</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/05/kindle-anti-incendiary.html/comment-page-1#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Asacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 09:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=96#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it strange how the old yet useful often breaks or rips at the precise time that we are ogling the new and shiny?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it strange how the old yet useful often breaks or rips at the precise time that we are ogling the new and shiny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domen</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/05/kindle-anti-incendiary.html/comment-page-1#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Domen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=96#comment-785</guid>
		<description>I fear it&#039;s not a lack of imagination or cultural attunement that are keeping Kindle &quot;old&quot;. As is obvious to those who have bought e-books, etc. unrestricted use and sharing of information aren&#039;t too popular with book publishers and distributors. It&#039;s called copyright - as in: you have to make sure that the information doesn&#039;t flow in the WRONG direction. And that is bound to happen with &quot;new media&quot;...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear it&#8217;s not a lack of imagination or cultural attunement that are keeping Kindle &#8220;old&#8221;. As is obvious to those who have bought e-books, etc. unrestricted use and sharing of information aren&#8217;t too popular with book publishers and distributors. It&#8217;s called copyright &#8211; as in: you have to make sure that the information doesn&#8217;t flow in the WRONG direction. And that is bound to happen with &#8220;new media&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

