<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Lutz and marketing malpractice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2009/07/richard-lutz-and-marketing-malpractice.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/07/richard-lutz-and-marketing-malpractice.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:10:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCracken</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/07/richard-lutz-and-marketing-malpractice.html/comment-page-1#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-527</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Arvind Venkataramani&lt;br /&gt;
(grant, your blog is acting up. tried to comment and it just gave me missing images and nice spinning wheels.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Re your gatorade post: Lutz IS apparently behind some of GM&#039;s moves - a designer friend of mine (self-employed, not a big name) got cal...led in to Detroit recently - partly because he obsesses about cars on Twitter. Their (GM&#039;s) words: &quot;we haven&#039;t been listening to you in 20 years, we&#039;re sorry, and it&#039;s time to fix that&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arvind Venkataramani<br />
(grant, your blog is acting up. tried to comment and it just gave me missing images and nice spinning wheels.)</p>
<p>Re your gatorade post: Lutz IS apparently behind some of GM&#39;s moves &#8211; a designer friend of mine (self-employed, not a big name) got cal&#8230;led in to Detroit recently &#8211; partly because he obsesses about cars on Twitter. Their (GM&#39;s) words: &quot;we haven&#39;t been listening to you in 20 years, we&#39;re sorry, and it&#39;s time to fix that&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roo</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/07/richard-lutz-and-marketing-malpractice.html/comment-page-1#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Roo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-526</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You know... The sad part about this is that I think you really NAILED IT.  They just don&#039;t get it.   When Oldsmobile went under in &#039;04, I felt like a little piece of me died. Like losing a distant relative or a celebrity.   With Pontiac, the same thing... And I never even owned one!  But, I grew up with them. It&#039;s a shame to see GM stray so far from success... Especially, now that WE&#039;RE co-signing onto this continuation of b.s.  Not sure what to make of those comments... &#039;Marketing myopia,&#039; denial,  &#039;fronting&#039; or having absolutely no sense of where they are in the marketplace. Whatever the case, it strikes me as unacceptable. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If GM vehicles &#039;easily trounce the foreign competition...&#039; really?? REALLY?!  Then maybe that &#039;success&#039; is in areas that just don&#039;t matter as much in impacting sales.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for calling him on it,  and it wasn&#039;t bad tempered/hectoring to me. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know&#8230; The sad part about this is that I think you really NAILED IT.  They just don&#39;t get it.   When Oldsmobile went under in &#39;04, I felt like a little piece of me died. Like losing a distant relative or a celebrity.   With Pontiac, the same thing&#8230; And I never even owned one!  But, I grew up with them. It&#39;s a shame to see GM stray so far from success&#8230; Especially, now that WE&#39;RE co-signing onto this continuation of b.s.  Not sure what to make of those comments&#8230; &#39;Marketing myopia,&#39; denial,  &#39;fronting&#39; or having absolutely no sense of where they are in the marketplace. Whatever the case, it strikes me as unacceptable. </p>
<p>If GM vehicles &#39;easily trounce the foreign competition&#8230;&#39; really?? REALLY?!  Then maybe that &#39;success&#39; is in areas that just don&#39;t matter as much in impacting sales.</p>
<p>Thanks for calling him on it,  and it wasn&#39;t bad tempered/hectoring to me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srp</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/07/richard-lutz-and-marketing-malpractice.html/comment-page-1#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>srp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-525</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lutz also ignores the problem of signaling. Even if you, a button-down conservative sort, happen to like the way you look with a nose ring for purely aesthetic, formal reasons, getting one will cause people to infer various untrue things about your values and character. You might decide to put up with this on a conscious basis, but to be unaware of the signals one sends with these choices is likely to be dysfunctional. Similarly, a GM car sends a signal that many, many people don&#039;t want to send. GM needs to fix that, but they&#039;ll probably be dead before that happens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lutz also ignores the problem of signaling. Even if you, a button-down conservative sort, happen to like the way you look with a nose ring for purely aesthetic, formal reasons, getting one will cause people to infer various untrue things about your values and character. You might decide to put up with this on a conscious basis, but to be unaware of the signals one sends with these choices is likely to be dysfunctional. Similarly, a GM car sends a signal that many, many people don&#39;t want to send. GM needs to fix that, but they&#39;ll probably be dead before that happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/07/richard-lutz-and-marketing-malpractice.html/comment-page-1#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a possible campaign for GM, in this statement:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;I think an audacious and bold person with a mind of his or her own would go to a dealership  . . .&quot; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m thinking something like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Buy GM and show yourself to be audacious and bold with a mind of your own!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Well-executed, that campaign should garner a lot of lemmings, right there!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s a possible campaign for GM, in this statement:</p>
<p>&quot;I think an audacious and bold person with a mind of his or her own would go to a dealership  . . .&quot; </p>
<p>
I&#39;m thinking something like:</p>
<p>&quot;Buy GM and show yourself to be audacious and bold with a mind of your own!&quot;</p>
<p>
Well-executed, that campaign should garner a lot of lemmings, right there!</p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Asacker</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/07/richard-lutz-and-marketing-malpractice.html/comment-page-1#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Asacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantmccracken.com/cco/http:/grantmccracken/page-title#comment-523</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;a simple act of meaning transfer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not so simple, and not really a transfer.  More like a co-creation, with the result being a personal narrative.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;a simple act of meaning transfer.&quot;</p>
<p>Not so simple, and not really a transfer.  More like a co-creation, with the result being a personal narrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
