<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When did &#8220;several&#8221; become &#8220;multiple?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Perhaps there has been an explosion lately in math majors.  To us, multiple means n&gt;1
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps there has been an explosion lately in math majors.  To us, multiple means n>1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCracken</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-28</guid>
		<description>
Tom, excellent, we are mobile even when seeking to be immobile! Thanks,, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, excellent, we are mobile even when seeking to be immobile! Thanks,, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitter.com/tomguarriello</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>twitter.com/tomguarriello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Why do we want to sound more official and in control especially when the rest of the culture is becoming both more informal and more playful? Because sometimes we want to be &quot;them&quot; and sometimes we want to be &quot;us.&quot; We&#039;re flexible, so we can be whatever we want to be just by the flip of a word. Nice observation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we want to sound more official and in control especially when the rest of the culture is becoming both more informal and more playful? Because sometimes we want to be &#8220;them&#8221; and sometimes we want to be &#8220;us.&#8221; We&#8217;re flexible, so we can be whatever we want to be just by the flip of a word. Nice observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCracken</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-26</guid>
		<description>
Laurie, very well said (and not at all edu-jargonic)!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurie, very well said (and not at all edu-jargonic)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I think multiple is more vague and therefore less risky than several.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think multiple is more vague and therefore less risky than several.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaurieWatt</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>LaurieWatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Did you notice...
one, a couple, several, many, lots and lots, tons, countless, innumerable -- they all have a warmth, a common resonance.
&quot;multiple&quot; is mathematic, edu-jargonic, an attempt to sound more educated than perhaps one really is. Truly sad. It creates a barrier -- and as McCracken suggests, it&#039;s police-speak, bureaucratic.
Can&#039;t we use language that warms us, unites us, makes connections between us all?  We should try harder to communicate as people, not as individuals cast in roles.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice&#8230;<br />
one, a couple, several, many, lots and lots, tons, countless, innumerable &#8212; they all have a warmth, a common resonance.</p>
<p>&#8220;multiple&#8221; is mathematic, edu-jargonic, an attempt to sound more educated than perhaps one really is. Truly sad. It creates a barrier &#8212; and as McCracken suggests, it&#8217;s police-speak, bureaucratic.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t we use language that warms us, unites us, makes connections between us all?  We should try harder to communicate as people, not as individuals cast in roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCracken</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-23</guid>
		<description>
SI, thats the right direction! Thx, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SI, thats the right direction! Thx, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOLUTIONS_ink</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>SOLUTIONS_ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I read the blog multiple times and have some thoughts - several actually.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the blog multiple times and have some thoughts &#8211; several actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCracken</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-21</guid>
		<description>
Jason, perfect, thanks, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, perfect, thanks, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCracken</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2009/12/when-did-several-become-multiple.html/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=7#comment-20</guid>
		<description>
Andrew, well said, legalistic vocabulary, the phrase I was searching for.  Thx, Grant
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, well said, legalistic vocabulary, the phrase I was searching for.  Thx, Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

