<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Virgin can learn from Apple (and three other thoughts on a plane)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/2010/06/what-virgin-can-learn-from-apple-and-three-other-thoughts-on-a-plane.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com/2010/06/what-virgin-can-learn-from-apple-and-three-other-thoughts-on-a-plane.html</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCracken: What Virgin Can Learn From Apple (And Three Other Thoughts On A Plane) - PSFK</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2010/06/what-virgin-can-learn-from-apple-and-three-other-thoughts-on-a-plane.html/comment-page-1#comment-9043</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCracken: What Virgin Can Learn From Apple (And Three Other Thoughts On A Plane) - PSFK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultureby.com/?p=1478#comment-9043</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue reading&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue reading&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2010/06/what-virgin-can-learn-from-apple-and-three-other-thoughts-on-a-plane.html/comment-page-1#comment-8952</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultureby.com/?p=1478#comment-8952</guid>
		<description>the luxury continuation is not surprising at all. In the biggest part of the world ( asia of course ) all the turns and twists that saw luxury play out over the last century from extreme exclusivity to massification, from overt badging to inner achievenment and self worth continue to play. But Grant you have touched on simething we have been noting and exploring for a while .. what we have labelled Intelux ( and maye a seperate post on why we all feel the need to develop new language for the blatently obvious concept is more appropriate for a CCO debate ).
the idea of intelligent luxury strated I guess with LV, Cartier etc undertaking to add High culture to their brand associations with exclusive art shows etc. But at the same time in Japan for example ( that most extreme of mass in depoth luxury markets ) we noted it when we saw people , ordinary people in so many ways, who were real experts on a particular luxury brand, product, stitching style etc. You know something is happening when you hear an ordinary, not particularly high middle class housewife, saying that she collects bags not by brand or designer but by the person who designed a particulat stitch used on inner linings. Or when the iphone was launched that people in focus groups were talking not of Steve J but of the design team and why they used a particular curve on the corners of the device.
so your note struck a chord. what I am seeing from my Tokyo based, asia centric view is that luxury never slipped away .. it just keeps getting deeper. Luv to swap stories on this some time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the luxury continuation is not surprising at all. In the biggest part of the world ( asia of course ) all the turns and twists that saw luxury play out over the last century from extreme exclusivity to massification, from overt badging to inner achievenment and self worth continue to play. But Grant you have touched on simething we have been noting and exploring for a while .. what we have labelled Intelux ( and maye a seperate post on why we all feel the need to develop new language for the blatently obvious concept is more appropriate for a CCO debate ).</p>
<p>the idea of intelligent luxury strated I guess with LV, Cartier etc undertaking to add High culture to their brand associations with exclusive art shows etc. But at the same time in Japan for example ( that most extreme of mass in depoth luxury markets ) we noted it when we saw people , ordinary people in so many ways, who were real experts on a particular luxury brand, product, stitching style etc. You know something is happening when you hear an ordinary, not particularly high middle class housewife, saying that she collects bags not by brand or designer but by the person who designed a particulat stitch used on inner linings. Or when the iphone was launched that people in focus groups were talking not of Steve J but of the design team and why they used a particular curve on the corners of the device. </p>
<p>so your note struck a chord. what I am seeing from my Tokyo based, asia centric view is that luxury never slipped away .. it just keeps getting deeper. Luv to swap stories on this some time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

