<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>CultureBy - Grant McCracken &#187; Shameless self promotion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureby.com/shameless-self-promotion/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureby.com</link>
	<description>This Blog Sits At the Intersection of Anthropology and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reinventing Wal-mart</title>
		<link>http://cultureby.com/2006/08/reinventing_wal.html</link>
		<comments>http://cultureby.com/2006/08/reinventing_wal.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shameless self promotion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_culture/?p=637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cultureby.com/images/various/flock_and_flow_1.jpg"><img width="200" height="299" border="0" src="http://cultureby.com/images/various-small/flock_and_flow_1.jpg" title="Flock_and_flow_1" alt="Flock_and_flow_1" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; float: right;" /></a> The last time I looked Wal-Mart was responsible for 8% of all the retail in the US.&nbsp; It has captured this position by dominating the low end of the market.</p>
<p> Now Wal-Mart plans to pursue upscale markets.&nbsp; There is a Wal-Mart test store in Plano that features &quot;expensive jewelry, $500 bottles of wine, plasma TV sets and other expensive items along with organic foods.&quot;&nbsp; </p>
<p> Being the master of the low end is not easy.&nbsp; Many are called, few will flourish.&nbsp; The secret is to squeeze costs and margins till they cry for help.&nbsp; It may not easy, but it is simple.&nbsp; The model is unmistakable: pile em high, sell em cheap.</p>
<p> So when Wal-Mart decides to go after the upscale market, it is suddenly obliged to learn an almost <strong>entirely new marketing game</strong>. Now the trick is to follow consumer taste and preference has it plays whack-a-mole niche to niche, leaping daringly trend to trend.&nbsp; </p>
<p> The good news, I think it&#8217;s good news, is that Target has demonstrated that this is possible.&nbsp; To its credit, Target didn&#8217;t just master some of the secrets of the high end, it actually rewrote the rule book.&nbsp; It came precious close to capturing design as it was moving from a small community of professionals with a characteristic weakness for interesting glasses to a much larger American mainstream.&nbsp; Target very nearly&nbsp; branded design as its own.&nbsp; It was a brilliant, audacious piece of marketing.&nbsp; (Thanks to Vincent LaConte, as below, I know that the hero of this piece is Ron Johnson, now VP of retail at Apple.&nbsp; Johnson was Vice President of Merchandising for Target Stores until 2000, presiding over what the Apple corporate website calls &quot;new initiatives for branding, marketing and merchandising.&quot;)</p>
<p>But now that is gone.&nbsp; Or better, Wal-Mart will now have to be design-sensitive but it will get no special credit for being so.&nbsp; Is there a compelling play out there that it can claim for itself?&nbsp; It might go looking for a celebrity hookup of the kind that Kmart had with Martha Stewart.&nbsp; In this case, a taste arbiter lends her mastery of consumer taste to the retailer.&nbsp; It&#8217;s a kind of one stop shopping for the retailer.&nbsp; The perilous business of consumer sensitivity is farmed out to someone with their own suburb instincts and established track record.</p>
<p> Or, and as the author of Flock and Flow this would be my preference: that Wal-Mart invest in a big board with which all the trends and drivers of consumer taste and preference are tagged and tracked.&nbsp; This would be useful for the low end work.&nbsp; There will come a time in our culture where low prices and fast response times are not enough to satisfy the dynamism of the marketplace.&nbsp; But it will be especially at the useful at the top end where already we are seeing trends change so fast, we are sometimes tempted to wonder if they weren&#8217;t merely a figment of someone&#8217;s imagination, no sooner thought than gone.</p>
<p> Yes, on careful and dispassionate reflection, that would be my recommendation: build a big board using Flock and Flow as the template.&nbsp; You know where to find me.&nbsp; </p>
<p> References</p>
<p> McCracken, Grant. 2006.&nbsp; Flock and Flow: predicting and managing change in a dynamic marketplace. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. on Amazon <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0253347599/sr=8-1/qid=1154628728/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-4912942-9605755?ie=UTF8">here</a>. </p>
<p> Van Riper, Tom.&nbsp; 2006.&nbsp; Wal-Mart Goes Upscale.&nbsp; Forbes.&nbsp; August 30, 2006. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/08/30/walmart-goes-upscale-cx_tvr_0830walmart.html?partner=retail_newsletter">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultureby.com/2006/08/reinventing_wal.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

