I just saw the announcement for the Holberg International Memorial Prize. This year the award goes to Fredric R. Jameson. In addition to this great honor, Dr. Jameness will receive 4.5 m NOK (roughy, $775,000 USD).
What happened to the humanistic disciplines happened in two stages, and we are just emerging (if we are in fact to emerge) from the second stage. In the beginning, what took place was not a redefinition of disciplinarity so much as a kind of antidisciplinarity. Academic activity began flowing toward paradigms that defined themselves essentially in antagonism towards traditional disciplines.
a widely diffused skepticism about the universality of any particular line of inquiry or pedagogy, and a rigorously enforced suspicion of the notion of "rigor." In English, the discipline that seems, to its own practitioners and to others, the most thoroughly at sea, the mood is more of bewilderment than anything else.
Wait, is Menand specifically talking about Jameson here? It’s not clear from your quotation. And is there really a suspicion of “rigor” in general? That seems too strong, can you give some examples?
Bravo, again, Grant. Well stated. But the irony is complete — the “discipline” has little choice but to honor the man who’s been drilling holes in its hull. Has the last humanities grad student left yet? If not, please don’t forget to turn out the lights. Thank you!
Hilarious.